Indicate the age of the Pyramids of Pharaohs. Pyramids of Egypt. Pyramid scheme Heops

Finish 19.03.2021

Finish

A new hypothesis was born in Ulyanovsk about the construction date of the Egyptian pyramids. Her author is 1 entrepreneur Sergey Baiderakov, he has already sent his development by Moscow scientists1Egiptologists and is now waiting for an answer from them. And we decided not to wait for the verdict of scientists of husbands and ask the author, how is he, living on the Volga, studied the overseas miracle of the world? And how many pyramids are actually about?
It turned out that it was possible to study the unsurpassed architectural structures of the Egyptians without leaving home. We only stand stock books. Based on the information received from the books, Sergey Baiderakov, in fact, put forward his hypothesis.
Science has not yet determined the exact date of construction of the Egyptian pyramids, scientists in their definitions differ even on hundreds, but for thousands of years. According to the traditional version, they have been standing 4.5 thousand years. Such an age has shown the study by the method of radiocarbon decay. There are other methods, such as link to stars. Astronomers argue that the pyramids copy the location of the stars in the Constellation of Orion, which was observed 12.5 thousand years ago. Our Ulyanovsky researcher Evgeny Menshov defined that 12.5 thousand years ago, the planet Earth, Mars, Venus in the Star Sky also were located exactly how the pyramids are now. In this matter, the words were also told his word: the well-known American psychics Edgar Casey, who lived at the pyramids and studied them, gave the Peli of Pharaohs also 12.5 thousand years. There is a hypothesis that estimates their age in one hundred thousand years, but it is no confirmed.
All this information has studied Sergey Baiderakov. Then he drew attention to one interesting fact, which is not particularly advertised by anywhere: the Sphinx, located near the pyramids, judging by the radio carbon studies, "lives" is already 8.5 thousand years old. That is, older than the pyramids themselves. Such a discrepancy has intrigued the Ulyanovsky entrepreneur: it is known that the pyramids, and the Sphinx are built from the same stones, on the same technology. The age of the sphinx is not advertised because it does not fit into the frame of the age of the pyramids, made the withdrawal of bidder. So, in this hypothesis something unclean.
And then he included all his knowledge of physics obtained in the Kazan Aviation Institute, information on geopathogenic zones, which was closely engaged in recent years.
- I have long been interested in such a phenomenon as uneven aging of buildings built at the same time, "says Biderukov. There are, for example, "Khrushchev", grew up in different cities forty years ago. They stand nearby, built on the same technology, from the same materials, alone and the same Troops. But they look different: some are more preserved, others are worn out. It came across me to think that in some areas the time changes faster and the houses are growing faster, perhaps the people living in them. So, these houses could be in geopathic zones.
To note, the pathogenic zone is a place negatively affecting a person or physical objects. And Geo means that this impact is caused by geological faults.
There are numerous studies on these adverse zones, including those located in them buildings.
If there are destroying, geopathogenic, zones, there must be other - geomanty, with a rejuvenating effect, solved by bidder. This idea of \u200b\u200bhim and inspired. He tied this version with the pyramids - maybe they are younger than those who were erected. Simply put, well preserved. & NBSP
- I am satisfied with the age of pyramids - 12.5 thousand years. It can be assumed that they are erected in a positive energy zone, which does not give them age. Perhaps this positive energy forms the location of the pyramids themselves. Today it's no secret that the pyramid creates a certain energy. It is not by chance that small pyramids are used for therapeutic purposes. In this energy field, the youth of the pyramids may well be supported. If we take into account that they are the same proportion, are strictly equally oriented in space, then in resonance can create a single field, respectively, to hold the same age. The Sphinx stands separately, but not far, and falls into this rejuvenating field of the pyramids. Accordingly, the Sphinx is also rejuvenated, but not as much as the pyramids themselves. I believe that this hypothesis deserves attention, since it explains the discrepancies at the age of the pyramids and the difference in the longevity of the pyramids and the Sphinx.
Of course, the hypothesis requires verification. To confirm or refutation, it is necessary to conduct an examination at least "Khrushchev" and understand whether there is a difference in time.
The pyramids store a lot of secrets and the magnet pulls scholars. How to know, maybe a new road has been laid in their rayster, and it happened in our Ulyanovsk.

It has long been noticed that the Egyptian pyramids are very strange, and sometimes destructively affect modern, accurate electronic devices. According to some data, about 85% of devices who visited the pyramids are out of order. Old residents of Cairo, say that during the time of the Arab-Israeli war of 1967, several Israeli aircraft who were going to fly over the pyramids of Giza, for incomprehensible reasons fell in the sand. Modern Arabs explain it simply: "Curse of Pharaohs," and scientists, try not to pay attention to such coincidences. And only independent researchers who want to answer all questions, tend to believe that inside the pyramids there is a powerful source of energy or electromagnetic radiation, whose nature is not yet known to us.

Very curious results gave a study of the pyramids with the help of a thermal violate system. It is clearly seen that inside the pyramids there are several very powerful energy sources. So what is it really? Ancient energy installations? Or an eternal engine, open in those ancient times? The results of this experiment, scientists, as always, were written off for the malfunction of the device itself, especially since after the expedition he really began to join and issue incorrect information.

The principles and materials that were used in the construction of the pyramids are apparently different from those who used the ancient Romans and the Greeks. And here it is not about dozens of thousands of slaves, who described the ancient Greek historian Herodotus. Yes, and he could have known something to know about the technologies and intentions of the ancient Egyptians. After all, it was also separated from the time of construction of the pyramids in Giza, and several thousand years were separated. It turns out, he simply outlined his arguments about how the pyramids could be erected. It should be borne in mind that this opinion was evolving in accordance with the ideas of their time.

Famous geodesist and archaeologist Flinders Petri (1853-1942), studied the pyramids, and made his conclusions about technology and the time of their construction. According to F. Petri, there were such instruments at the disposal of the ancient builders, "To which we only approach in our development!". Flinders carefully examined the sarcophagus, located in the pyramid of Heops and reported that it was cut out of the granite block with saws, the dimensions of which were "at least 2.5 meters in length." It is known that such granite has the highest strength on Earth, therefore it is assumed that such saws were made of bronze, and their cutting edges are covered with diamond crumb.

Even more questions caused a survey of the cavity of the sarcophagus: its inner part was much more difficult to process than simply cut the block from the granite rock. Petri believes that for such treatment, the Egyptians would need "move from the reciprocating cutting to the rotational, i.e. how to turn the saw into the tube; Then, having done annular grooves formed with a cylindrical drill and breaking the remaining cores, the ancient workers could handle a huge amount of material with minimal labor costs. The diameter of such drills fluctuated in the range from 5 to 140 millimeters, and the width of the cutting edge was from 0.7 to 5 millimeters. " Of course, Petri and other scientists recognize that anyone from archaeologists and egyptologists managed to find such tools. However, if the Egyptians did not use diamond saws and drills, then creating such structures is simply not possible! And the deeper and detail of Petri researched this question, the more mysterious the stone technologies of the ancient Egyptians became the mysterious.
Think ourselves, not strangely that at the dawn of civilization, more than 4500 years ago, the ancient Egyptians used drilling machines, which only appeared in the industrial era, which allowed them to bury the righteous stones almost without effort?
Of all this it follows that the pyramids were built using technologies that exceeded the level of our technology. In addition, you can notice an armed look that their proportions, practical ideal. It suggests that the ancient Egyptians, math and astronomy, brilliantly knew the ancient Egyptians. The angle of inclination of the side faces of the pyramid of Heops - 52 degrees is selected in such a way that the initial height of the monument is 146.6 meters, the perimeter of its base is 920.80 meters and all this is in the same respect as the radius of the sphere with its circle. In addition, the researchers found out that in the planning of the pyramid of Heops used the Rule of the Golden section, which is officially documented by architects only from the time of the Middle Ages: the height of the pyramid is exactly billion times less than the distance from the Sun to the Earth.

Age of ancient pyramids

The global scientific community is inclined to believe that the real age of the pyramid ranges from 2 to 4 centuries to our era. This is the official version, apparently created in order to hide the real age of the oldest facilities. The truthfulness of these figures is allowed, and researchers involved in the history of Atlantis are forced. They argue that the mention of the pyramids was still at the time of this sunken civilization, which existed long before the ancient Egyptians.

It is curious that the age of the Sphinx is most likely incorrect. By the nature of his water erosion, it is safe to say that his age is significantly higher than the officially announced dates. These values \u200b\u200bbring it to the times of the Great Flood, which was probably the ninth millennium BC. Scientists noticed that the nature of erosion was caused by strong rains that ceased to go to Egypt a few thousand years to 2500 BC. e. (It is this date, according to Egyptologists, is considered the date of the Sphinx building). That is, according to the most modest calculations, the Sphinx refers to the period between 7,000 and 6000 BC!
Currently, there is a feeling that the more people find out about the pyramids and ancient civilizations, the more questions appear, to which no one can answer unequivocally ...

The age of the Great Pyramid

Egyptologists have no doubt that the pyramids were built in Egypt when he joined the dynastic period. But for many authors of popular science books, this is not a fact. As a last resort, they agree that this assertion is true for all such structures, except for the Hope's pyramid. According to some authors, it represents a monument that we are inherited from extraterrestrial civilization that visited our planet tens of thousands of years ago. Sitchin's already mentioned Zakaria, one of many dozen defenders of this theory, claims that the Great Pyramid served as a beacon for spacecraft arriving on Earth (as well as a "forward prison" for aliens). Others believe that this is a memorial, built by Atlanta who survived after the death of their civilization. According to some researchers, the pyramid of Heops - a monument, which remained inherited from some kind of civilization that existed to the World Flood. So, John Anthony West leads as an example located near the sphinx and declares that traces of water erosion are noticed on it. According to him, the fact that we are now clearly visible, could not arise only as a result of the rainstream, which took place on this territory from 2500 BC. Thus, it also relates to the date of construction of the Heops pyramid to 10 400 BC, the mythical date, which makes very many take the interpretation of the seside. Unfortunately, it is often implied that the prediction itself has a greater weight than a logical substantiation of one or another theory, or at least reinforces it. Therefore, it is quite logical that serious scientists, and Egyptologists, among other things, oppose people who wish to bring guesses and predictions to scientific debates. Scientific discussions, as you know, no rally approval and prophecies are required.

So on the basis of what science determines the age of the pyramids? In 1984, the implementation of a large-scale project to determine the pyramid dating based on the radiocarbon analysis method was started, during which the pyramids were taken to study 64 sample organic substances. The results showed that Egyptologists were mistaken about 400 years - the pyramids were older than previously expected. However, measurements of some samples showed that the pyramids are older than "total" for 120 years, however, this is significant. Mark Lenner Summing up new discoveries, said: "Now it is really important ... I mean that this discovery caused a very strong hype. It turns out that the pyramids in Giza are four hundred years older than the most scientists believed. " Although Lenner himself, the Egyptologist, must admit that it is distinguished by a significantly more scientific approach to the problem than many scientists associated with this topic. Perhaps only because he just sincerely wants to figure it out. Unfortunately, it is not very well versed in another science - psychology, because "obviously" does not understand his colleagues: no such "strong noise" did not arise. Most of the Egyptologists preferred to simply not notice the results of the research than to dispute them.

Based on the survey of 15 samples, the age of the Heops pyramid was clarified and the conclusion was concluded that it was built in no way earlier than 2985 BC. - Five hundred years earlier than thought before. However, and the refined date is not enough in order to attribute the construction of the Pyramid of the Atlantam, allegedly lived more than 10,000 years ago. At this place, most commentators stop, but I would like to go in my arguments for another chamber further, as a radio carbon analysis set several new questions before researchers. And one of them is whether the pyramids on the plateau have built the very pharaohs who are attributed to their construction?

Hefren's pyramid was built in twenty-five years after the construction of the Great Pyramid in 2960, this gives grounds with a high probability of probability to assume that both pyramids were composite parts of a single complex and were built on the command of the pharaohs who lived one after another (and maybe one and one and same). It would also be logical to expect that Micheryine's pyramid was constructed over the next twenty-fifty years. However, radiocarbon analysis determines the date of its construction approx. 2572 BC. - Almost four centuries later the pyramid of Heops! Moreover, during the analysis of Sphinx samples, it turned out that it was constructed approximately in 2416 BC, that is, almost five centuries after the Hefren pyramid, and it was assumed that this pyramid and Sphinx were built together ...

However, the new dating of the end of the construction of the Great Pyramid - 3000 BC. - did not arrange both camps: neither the Egyptologists, nor supporters of the Atlanta version. And this once again proves that scientific experiences can sometimes be unpopular even among representatives of science. Both sides of the "scientific dispute" have tried not to notice important results of the experiment, since they do not correspond to their ideas. As a result, you can now read articles in which there are such paragraphs: "Even if the radiocarbon analysis of fifteen samples from the Great Pyramid was held, according to, with the maximum thoroughness, we still cannot be confident that on the basis of its results you can With accuracy to talk about the age of the whole structure. Samples for the analysis were taken from the external cladding of the pyramid or from the space between the facing plates and the blocks of the pyramid, where they could get into the repairs during the repair work. As for the church of a large sphinx, the dates of its construction, determined by the radio-carbon analysis method (2085 and 2746 BC), cannot be considered accurate, since large limestone blocks, of which the temple is composed, was made simultaneously with the Sphinx themselves. And the results of weathering of the rocks of this sculpture, according to most geologists (but not egyptologists), no doubt that its age, at least - seven or nine thousand years "(6).

In fact, true, there is only one geologist, representing this "most", and his name Robert Shoch. But these ardent performances in favor of one point of view are becoming even more vascular when we mention that in 1995 new studies have been conducted with other, but similar materials, and they fully confirmed the results of analyzes 1984.

In the end, it becomes clear that the status of the Great Pyramid can not not cause pity. How are you still arrogant, we appeal to the only miracles of the world that have reached us! However, the same can be said about all the heritage of the era of the pyramids. Egyptologists too long and with some kind of children's stubbornness clung to obsolete dogmas and did not approach the understanding of the true nature of these structures. It should only be welcomed to the development of the science of the ancient Egypt of such researchers as Davidovits, and undergo their hypotheses to serious, thoughtful analysis and criticism. Instead, we hear so far from official science only caustic attacks and see idiotic disregard. The radio-carbon analysis method must be adopted by scientists for armament and become the main means to determine the true age of different pyramids. It should also be recognized that since the mummy could not be found in one of the pyramids yet, it means that it is possible that these structures are built not as tombs, even despite the fact that on the walls of some of them there are images with the scenes of the Pharaoh sky. I also want to note that many rather controversial conclusions about the nature of the pyramids are made on the basis of completely ridiculous assumptions, and often greatly absurdity theories acquire and, for example, the theory that "they were built by the descendants of Atlantov in 10400 BC. er.). Nevertheless, it is obvious that both parties do nothing to a genuine understanding of what pyramids are presented, not to mention the fact that no one could answer the question of who built them when and why.

However, recently there has been hope to find a randering ...

From the books of the gods of the new millennium [with illustrations] by Elford Alan.

author shoch robert M.