Agnostic and an atheist: what is general and what is the difference. Agnostic and atheist: what is general and what the difference in the direction of an increase in atheism and agnosticism

There are about 200 species of various religions in the world. Adherents of every faith are confident that it is their worldview and their God that is the only true option to create peace. It is not surprising that thanks to a huge number of different religions, inside the ancient times there were insolent times, who doubted the truth of one or another faith, as well as to the existence of God as the creator of our world. Among unbelievers people, the leading positions occupy agnostics and atheists, but their worldview differs from each other, having a single foundation.

Atheists

Atheist - a man who does not believe in the existence of God, as well as - in supernatural forces, paranormal phenomena and otherworldly worlds. Atheists do not recognize the church, religion and faith. It can be said that an atheist believes only in what can be touched by hands. For atheists, a complete confidence in self-sufficiency of man and nature is characteristic. For them, there is nothing that it is impossible to explain with the help of logic and common sense.

Common sense, consciousness and intelligence play for atheist a decisive role in life. Atheists are convinced that believers are blind fools who are on the system built by society. Over the last century, the number of atheists has increased significantly. In some countries, the number of unbeliever people reaches 50 percent of the population of the planet.

Agnostic

Agnostic is a man who is convinced that it is impossible to prove the existence of God, as well as it is impossible to prove its no existence. Agnostic - a person freely thinking, but at the same time a person is intellectually gifted. The agnostic can be inclined to partially recognize one or another faith, but never recognizes a single explanatory appearance of the worldview. For agnostics, it is characterized by a change of worldview and adaptation to different points of view, even contradictory to each other. The number of agnity increases every year. People believe that there is a certain highest strength, but do not give it a single meaning.

Common between agnostic and atheist

The first thing is that the general and main feature for agnostics and atheists is the lack of faith in a specific religion. For many centuries, scientists found inconsistencies in religions. Believers close their eyes to the fact that it is dispersed with common sense, mating on the faith in the one of their God. For agnostics and atheists, the impossibility of serving not one of the well-known religions is the basis of their worldview.

The second, which connects these two worldview is the inability to prove the existence of God and other supernatural phenomena. If for the agnostic this fact, as truthful, as well as the inability to prove the opposite, then for an atheist is enough of the fact that it is not refused.

The third overall feature is refusal of generally accepted thinking and worldview. And agnostic, and atheist - a man thinking.

The irrefutable fact that all people are born without faith in God. Subsequently, they instill with one or another faith, or they continue not to believe in the existence of a single God. Roughly speaking, all people on the planet are born with agnostic or atheists. The absence of faith, as a born phenomenon, is the fourth common feature between the agnostic and an atheist.

Distinction between agnostic and atheist

The first significant difference between the agnostic and an atheist is that the consciousness of the agnostic is open, and atheist is closed. The agnostic can constantly change his point of view, adhere to this or that fact, believing in the highest strength, without relying any of the famous religions. Atheist, in turn, firmly convinced that God does not exist, as well as nothing higher than a person. Agnostic, like a child, is open to all new and unknown, an atheist is a mature formed personality that does not require adjustment, according to his own conviction.

The second difference is emotional sensitivity. Atheists in nature, as a rule, egoists, agnostics - opposite humanists, sometimes altruists. Among the agnostics it is difficult to find a person who will firm everything and everyone that the blind faith is nonsense. Atheists react more aggressively on believers.

It is also impossible to prove the existence of a human soul. The atheist reverses his own soul, does not believe in the afterlife. Agnostic is convinced that the human soul exists, because he feels her presence within himself. The difference between attitude to the soul is the third difference between the agnostic and an atheist.

Attitude towards traditions is another feature that significantly distinguishes the agnostic from atheist. Atheist refuses to recognize traditional religious holidays, as they impose a certain faith. Agnostic if he loves, let's say - Christmas, never refuses the Christmas tree and gifts. Miscellaneous attitude to traditional church holidays is the fourth difference between the agnostic and an atheist.

Conclusion

In conclusion, I would like to say that how much society, system, system and religion exists, so many people who do not want to adhere to the generally accepted rules. The aggressive struggle with the system generates a new system, which is not particularly different from the one against which the confrontation is. Atheism is a system, since atheists are opposite to believers. The agnostic is located somewhere between, somewhere near, but at the same time anywhere. Whatever it was, people need to listen not only to their mind, but also their heart, because when these two are in harmony - truth is born.

Agnostic - Who is this in the modern world? The questions of faith in God remain in many respects unrequited for a person going on with their different ways. Without relying on any of the existing religions, such people are ready to believe in the existence of the Creator, if it is proven.

Who is the agnostic?

Agnostic is a person who does not deny the existence of God, but also recognizes that he may simply be. The percentage of agnostics is increasing every day. There are no authoritative sources for them in various religions, all the scriptures for agnostic are only literary monuments. All agnity tend to truth and understand that the world order is much more difficult than seeing at first glance, but in the absence of evidence, knowledge for agnostics becomes impossible, and the torture mind is questionable.

For the first time, the term "agnosticism" was introduced into the science of this year. Hexley is a follower of Darwinian evolutionary theory to designate its views on religious beliefs. Richard Dobinz in his work "God as an illusion" allocates several types of agnostics:

1. Agnostic in fact. Faith in God is slightly higher than the disbelief: not quite convinced, but it is inclined to believe that the Creator is still there.
2. Unbiased agnostic. Faith and disbelief exactly in half.
3. Agnostic prone to atheism. Dispersed a little more than faith, is experiencing a number of doubts.
4. Agnostic essentially more atheist. The probability of the existence of God is absolutely small, but not excluded.

What do the agnostic believe?

Can the agnostic believe in God, the question is asked by people who gradually depart from religion, but continue to believe "their" way. The typical characteristic of the agnostic helps to understand these questions:

• refrained from judgments: there is God or it is not, i.e. can neither refute neither prove the existence or absence of the Creator;
• believes that a person must act himself;
• even if God exists, then he has no matter to man;
• the concept of good and evil is relative, there is unwanted behavior;
• human conscience - Merylo his actions;
• most of the agnostics admire the personality and life of Jesus Christ, but they see in it an ordinary person, albeit endowed with supercading;
• doubt the existence of the soul and immortality;
• the meaning of life for agnostics is the life itself with her joys and sophors and those targets that man puts for themselves;
• they consider evidence of the existence of God or his absence of time, while there are few of them all dubious.

Agnosticism in philosophy

The German philosopher of New Time I. Kant was engaged in the study of the phenomenon of agnosticism and brought the slender and consistent theory of this direction. According to Cant, agnosticism in philosophy is the impossible to cognition of reality or reality by the subject, because:

1. Human abilities of knowledge are limited to its natural essence.
2. The world is unrecognized by itself, a person can only know the narrow external area of \u200b\u200bphenomena, objects, while the inner remains "Terra Incognita".
3. Cognition is a process in which the matter is studied by the matter of itself with its characteristic reflectivity.

D. Berkeley and D. Yum Other prominent philosophers also contributed to this direction of philosophy. Briefly agnostic who this and general features of agnosticism from the works of philosophers are presented in the following theses:

1. Agnosticism is closely connected with the philosophical flow - skepticism.
2. The agnostic rejects objective knowledge and the opportunity to know the world to fully.
3. God is impossible, obtaining reliable information about God is difficult.

Gnostics and agnostic - difference

Atheism and agnosticism united in such a direction as the atheistic agnosticism in which the belief is denied to any deity, but does not negate the presence of the divine manifestation in general. In addition to agnostics, there is an opposite "camp" - Gnostics (some philosophers consider them true believers). What is the difference between Gnostics and Agnostics:

1. Agnostics - questioning the knowledge of God, Gnostics just know what it is.
2. The followers of Gnosticism believe in the truth of human knowledge through the cognition of reality by scientific and mystical experience, the agnostics believe that the world is unrecognizable.

Agnostic and atheist - What is the difference?

Many people confuse these two concepts of agnostic and an atheist. Agnosticism in religion by many priests is perceived as atheism, but it is not true. It cannot be said that atheist and agnostic are fundamentally different representatives, and in some cases there are agnostics among atheists and on the contrary, and yet the difference between them exists:

1. Atheist does not fully doubt that there is no God, unlike the agnostic.
2. Atheists - materialists in its pure form, among the agnostics there are many idealists.

How to become agnostic?

Most people depart from traditional existing religions. In order to become agnostic, people should have doubts and questions. Often agnostics are former testers (believers) doubted God's existence. Sometimes this happens after tragic cases or a person expecting divine support does not receive it.

In this article we will look at who are such agnostics and atheists, and what they differ from each other.

In the modern world, positions are quite common, which in many ways oppose the existence of some religions or simply do not adhere to them. They are similar to each other, but not identical. The words atheism and agnosticism, as well as an atheist and agnostic cause a number of different associations from most people. But ordinary citizens often have an incorrect understanding of the problem in which the main difference between the adherents of these two concepts lies.

How to distinguish atheist from agnostic?

This is a matter of the existence of gods from the point of view of the vital positions of agnosticism and atheism. Because of this, conflicts arise in society and misunderstanding between adherents of these positions. To destroy any prejudices and incorrect interpretations of these terms, you need to consider differences between atheists and agnostics. But before, it is important to figure out the meaning of each word.

Who is an atheist?

Atheist is a person who does not believe in any God. Moreover, he denies all the paranormal phenomena and mystical figures. Yes, and all the other things that cannot be explained by logic and thinking.

• At first glance, atheism is a very simple concept, but it is often perceived incorrectly or not exactly. Consider atheism can be different, for example:
  • this is the lack of faith in the gods or one God;
  • distrust of the gods or, again, one God.
• But the most accurate definition that expresses the essence of the concept is the person who rejects the widespread statement "at least one God exists."
• This statement does not belong to atheists and are categorically them is not perceived. To be an atheist, a person does not need to take some active actions and even it is not necessary to realize that it adheres to this position.
• All that is required from such a person is not to support the allegations that are made by others, namely representatives of theism and church. Moreover, he is neglecting and belongs to believers, and to the faith itself.

Important: Atheists are not less than supporters of the church. And in some countries they cover half of the population. And even without hiding its position.

What person can be called agnostic?

Agnostic is any person who does not claim that there is any God. In other words, he doubts even in his beliefs. This idea may be incorrectly interpreted, so often the agnostics are confused with atheists.

• Since he does not claim that he knows for sure about the existence or absence of God, such a person is agnostic. But this question has some division. It is still still to find out whether he is an agnostic-an atheist or agnostic theist.
• The Agnostic-Atheist does not believe in any God, and the agnostic theist believes in the existence of at least one God. However, both of them do not apply for knowledge to support this belief. They believe that it is impossible to get true knowledge and confirm their hypothesis.
• It seems contradictory and difficult, but in fact it is quite easy and logical. Regardless of whether the agnostic believes or not, it is convenient for him to not declare his beliefs. He is just enough to know - either it's true or a lie.
• Understand the nature of atheism is quite easy - it's just the absence of faith in any gods. That agnosticism is not, as many believe, "thirdly" between atheism and theism.
• After all, agnosticism - This is not faith in God, but knowledge about him. Initially, he was invented to describe the position of a person who could not declare his beliefs. That is, he knows about the existence or absence of any gods.

Important: Nevertheless, many people have an erroneous impression that agnosticism and atheism are mutually exclusive. But, in fact, "I don't know" logically does not exclude "I do not believe."

How to understand who agnostic, and who is an atheist?

There is a simple test, which easily determines whether a person is a smallness or not, or what category it belongs.

• If a person says that he knows about the existence of any gods or one God, he is not agnostic, but the theist. That is, the usual believer for us. What God is another conversation.
• And if he believes and even knows exactly that God does not exist, then this is a representative of non-agnosticism, but atheism. That is, I am sure of 100% in my ideas. He is even just meaningless in something to persuade. Is that showing real arguments.
• Anyone who cannot answer "yes" to one of these questions is a person who can believe or not believe in one or several gods. Or he believes, but the concept itself cannot be explained. Therefore, the doubt is born within him. This person refers to the group of agnostics.

What is common between agnost and an atheist?

Yes, you can even install the thin thread of similarities between these simultaneously opposite and similar views.

• It should be noted that these are sensible people who guided by their mind. They have a clear idea of \u200b\u200bthe world and its components that should be clearly confirmed. That is, everything should have a logical explanation and, desirable, a visual example.
• Continues their thinking and inability to prove The existence of God. Yes, there is a Bible and legends about the past events. But no one saw the eyes, but did not touch his hands. It is the proverb "It is better to see 1 time than 10 times to hear."
• It is worth highlighting concreteness. Namely in the question with faith. That is, it is not. Neither the agnostic has an accurate wording about faith, no atheist has mitigating circumstances in this matter.

What is the difference between the agnostic and an atheist: comparison

The appearance of agnostics and atheists was provoked by historical conditions for the development of mankind. The main reason for their appearance is the presence of a large number of different religious beliefs in the world. After all, each representative argues that his position is the only true version of the world's creation.

• Already in primitive society people appeared who quarreled the accuracy of any religious belief. Whether it is paganism, Christianity or Judaism - is not particularly important. They did not recognize the existence of God as the Creator of all living and non-living.
• Among such people, representatives of agnosticism and atheism are most popular, but their life positions are somewhat different from each other.
• Nowadays, the difference between the atheist and the agnostic should be quite clear and easy to memorize.
  • Atheism is faith or, in this case, its absence. More precisely, it is, but lies in the opposite character that God is not.
  • Agnosticism is knowledge or, in particular, unconfirmed ignorance. Moreover, it does not want to declare or receive some facts.
• In other words, atheist does not believe in any God. And the agnostic does not know, there are any God or not.
• The misconception is common that agnosticism is a more "reasonable" position. While the atheism is "dogmatical" and, ultimately, indistinguishable from theisms, with the exception of the details. This is an incorrect argument because it distorts or incorrectly interprets the concept of theism, atheism and agnosticism.
• Atheists and agnostics, without a doubt, there are common features. But the differences are much more. The first difference is The attitude of representatives of both groups to theisms.
  • Atheists do not recognize theism and consider all believing supporters with their opponents. Moreover, they allocate some aggressiveness in this matter. Psychologists also note that among atheists there are more egoists and overly stubborn people.
  • The agnostics are loyally relate to theisms, and nothing prevents him from being at the same time and believing in God. By the way, there are many altruists among them. That is, they have an excessive kindness to others, even unauthorized people.

• It is also worth noting that the same person can act as an atheist and agnostic. The fact is that a person does not encounter the need to be only an atheist or agnostic.
• Regardless of how they approach the issue of the existence of God, agnostics and atheists are fundamentally different. Many people who took the label of agnostic, at the same time reject the atheist's label, even if it is technically applied to them.
• Teisters, in turn, recognize the existence of agnosticism and try to use hypotheses produced by them to combat atheism, sometimes their distorting.
• It is worth noting that there is a malicious dual standard. After all, theists claim that agnosticism is better than atheism. Since he is less dogmatically. But the agnostic, taking into account this argument, is rarely talking about it clearly. More often, they are trying to approve religious chairs, attacking atheists.
• Another difference - position in society. Atheists are still condemned and despised by society. The attitude is completely different.
  • Yes, without exaggeration. A distinctive feature of the concept of atheism is constant social pressure and prejudice regarding atheism and atheists. People who are not afraid to declare that they really do not believe in any God, still despised by society.
  • At the same time, the word "agnostic" is perceived as a more respectable position, and the position of agnosticism is considered more acceptable for the rest.
  • What is there, the agnity to be even prestigious, because they are considered to be representatives of science. Many agnity were philosophers, and with their opinion scientific figures are considered and now.

Important: But there is a major difference between the two concepts. Atheism is the lack of faith in any gods. Agnosticism is a recognition that the existence of gods is an unconfirmed hypothesis. Since it is impossible to check.

• It is also worth noting that they have different views on human soul. And it, by the way, can also be seen or touch. But, atheist and in this matter remains unshakable, but the agnostic has changed the position. He recognizes the presence of a soul in man. And argues that he feels it inside.
• And in conclusion I would like to recall the old folk traditions Or even family rituals. Yes, even banal birthday gifts. The agnostic does not see the meaning in them and even a little viciously reacts to all useless spending. The agnostic and in this matter changed a bit of hardness - he approves both hands for all traditional celebrations, if they like it.

It is worth summing up to never confuse the words of the words among themselves. Atheist is a concept associated with faith, or rather with its absence. Agnostic is a term associated with knowledge, or rather - with the impossibility of reliable knowledge.

Video: Agnostic and atheist, what is the difference?

What is the difference between the agnostic and an atheist? And got the best answer

Answer from Vladimir Pavlek [Guru]
Agnostic believes that it is impossible to answer the question "Is God?" Is impossible, and even more so, it is impossible to appreciate what is more likely - the existence of God or his absence. The trainer - denies the existence of God or, at least, considers the likelihood of the existence of God Too little to take it into account. In general, the atheist and agnostic usually both understand that it is impossible to prove that God is impossible - but if you ask both the same question: "Is God?" Is there any Agnostic will answer: - I don't know, on the one hand there are no reason to be convinced that it is, on the other hand, no one can prove that it is not. And atheist will say: - I also can not be sure of 100% that God is not, but all my own experience and the whole experience of previous generation shows that all physical laws are unchanged, no manifestations of the supernatural in the entire history have never been reliably recorded, all questions sooner or later find their answers without attracting God, the poet I think God is not. At least, for faith in it, no more grounds than for faith in the forest fairies, Santa Claus, etc. P.Sili is very short, then the agnostic probability of the existence of God is estimated at 50%, and the atheist is very close to zero.

Answer from Kind fairy[guru]
the agnostic believes that it is impossible to prove the presence or absence of God. And the atheist denies what God is just as a believer argues that God exists.

Answer from Magura[guru]
The atheist is never doubted, and the agnostic is questionable. Atheist has guarantees that God is not. The believer has a guarantee that God is. The agnostic has no guarantees except his own experience. He admits everything, he can tend to the fact that he is more like it, but he perfectly understands what can be wrong.

Answer from EOMAN Shevchenko[guru]
Agnostic thinks that God is and so pleased.

Answer from ЍL Chupacabra[guru]
Agnostic: There is God, there is no god - science is not known. Theater: But I know - no

Answer from Kaktus.[guru]
Agnosticism (from Dr. -Grech. Ἄγνωστος - "unrecognizable, unknown") - direction in philosophy, which considers it impossible objective knowledge of the surrounding reality through his own experience. Thus, agnosticism is questioned by the truth or possibility of evidence or refuting statements in some region, especially in metaphysics and theology. History was introduced by Professor Thomas Henry Huxley at the meeting of the metaphysical society in 1876. According to him, the agnostic is a person who has refused from the belief-related faith and convinced that the primary start of things is unknown, as it cannot be good. In other words, agnostic is a person who believes that it is impossible to prove the existence or non-existence of God. The term applies to the teachings of Herbert Spencer, Hamilton, George Berkeley, David Yuma and Dr.Agnosticism can be found already in antique philosophy, in particular in the prostagor, sophists, in antique skepticism. Attitude towards religiousism considers it impossible to know the truth in matters of the existence of God, eternal life, and other supernatural creatures, concepts and phenomena. This does not exclude the identity of the agnostic to religions or philosophical trends that give an unambiguous answer to these questions, since agnosticism does not fundamentally exclude the existence of divine entities and allows faith in them. Only the possibility of proof of the truth or the falsity of such entities is rational way. In a modern sense, the term "agnostic" can also be used to describe those who believe that the issue of the existence of God can be resolved, but considers the leading arguments in favor of the existence or non-existence of God Unconvincing and not sufficient to come on their base to an unambiguous conclusion. To reduce the ambiguity associated with the use of the term "agnosticism," sometimes use the concepts of "strict agnosticism" for the initial understanding of the word, and "empirical agnosticism" for a modern definition. Relationships with other philosophical flowsmiagnosticism develops in positivism, non-vectors and postposimalism as conventionalism. Agnosticism in theory of knowledgeAgnosticism can also be determined as a teaching based on the following statement: since the entire process of knowledge is based on experience, and the experience is subjective, then the subject will not be able to comprehend the essence of the object under study, the "thing in itself". Thus, the role of science is reduced to the knowledge of the experience, and not the essence of things and phenomena. In this sense, agnosticism is any philosophical teaching, denying the ability to achieve absolute truth, for example, cantianism. Famous Adherents Agnosticism Waters Matt Stone Egor Gaidar Zack Efron Artemy Troitsky Anna Vorontsova Bertrand Russell Huxley, Thomas Henry Herbert Spencer Hamilton Berkeley, George Um, David Robert Anton Wilson Mark Twain Thomas Edison Sigmund Freud Charles Chaplin Stephen Weinberg Carl Saglin Jack Nicholson Paul Verkhovlen Stephen Jay Gould Daniel Dennet Richard Liki John Carpenter Stephen Wozniak Douglas Adams Matt Grounding Stephen Pinker Bill Gates Carrie Fisher Graham Green

Answer from Ѓzhenok[guru]
The agnostic sometimes represents the dusing between two lights: theisms and atheism. But more here is the expression "suspended state". Agnostic talks about Suspense - suspension, suspension of judgment on the existence of God. Upon all, the defenders consider the agnostics by a masking atheist, and atheists are a cautious or shy testic. Who is such an agnostic, the third or one of the two? Obviously, the agnostic is not a theist, unless we change the meaning of the concept of "agnosticism" or not reject it by philosophical meaning. But it seems that the agnostic can not be considered an atheist, because it does not make any negative judgment on the existence of God. However, the atheistic position is not reduced only to the denial of the existence of God, as represents its everyday consciousness. Atheism is not only, and not so much theoretical position as a practical doctrine. Atheist rejects faith in God as incompatible with a consciousness of a free man and negatively refers to a religious cult. Atheist criticizes religion, relying on a wide arsenal of methods and data of science, taking the same anti-firmical installation as agnostic. And if the agnostic is effective, almost opposed religion and church, he is an atheist. And in this case, the disagreement between the agnostic and an atheist is internal theoretical. The difference between them is only that those arguments that an atheist considers it is quite likely in order to be taken as reliable, the agnostic is not sufficient for complete confidence (in the un-existence of God).

On the pages of scientific and popular publications devoted to the attitude of people to religion, it is necessary to deal with a number of specific terms. In particular, the authors of publications often divide people into two different categories - atheists and agnostics. What is the difference between them? If the first question is more or less clear, because in the Soviet period most of our compatriots counted themselves, then in relation to the second, not everything is so simple. We will try to figure out.

Brief excursion to linguistics

Starting a conversation about what an atheist differs from agnostic, clarify the value of each of these terms. Let us turn to their etymology, that is, the origin of the words themselves. Both noun - "atheist" and "agnostic" - in their beginning the prefix "A", expressing denial. The difference is that in the first case it belongs to the existing "TEOS" - God, and in the second to "Gnosis" - knowledge. Thus, it is not difficult to guess that the difference between atheists and agnostics is that the first deny God deny, and the second - some knowledge of which will be discussed below.

I do not recognize because I do not believe!

First of all, it is necessary to refute the commander and extremely erroneous opinion that an atheist is a unbelieving person. By no means. He is just a believer, but believes not in the existence of God, but in his absence. It is exactly the blind faith, because it cannot prove their point of view with any sensual sensations or logical buildings. The story knows a number of thinkers who tried to build an evidence base based on logical conclusions, but hardly the results of their work can be called convincing.

Looking at the path of the unfounded denial of not only God, but in general, all the supernatural, the atheists thereby preach the self-sufficiency of the material world, and at the same time the purely human origin of all religions without exception. By this, they oppose themselves to thoseists - supporters of the Divine origin of all things. As a rule, representatives of this category of people adhere to secular philosophical directions, such as humanism, materialism, naturalism, etc.

Maybe but unoccupied

In turn, the agnostics are not hurry to do so happy applications, although they are also not fans of the supernatural. What is the difference? Atheists and agnostics motivate their position in different ways. If the first with all categorical claims that there is no God, then the second to this key question generally refuse to answer. Their deep conviction is that the world around us is in principle unrecognizable, and therefore, it is impossible to obtain the only correct answer regarding the existence of God. It is precisely in this principal difference between agnostics and atheists.

Famous agnostics past

It is known that the term "agnosticism", expressing such a skeptical attitude towards the knowledge of the outside world, was first introduced into use by the English scientist Thomas Hexley in 1869, but the teaching itself appeared much earlier, while antique antiquity. In the XVIII century, His bright spokespers were Scotland David Yum (1711-1776, the portrait is given above) and German Immanuel Kant (1724-1804, the portrait is shown below).

The latter, in particular, argued that since we can judge the world around us only on the basis of those sensations that he gives rise to us, then there is no speech about any objectivity of perception. The logic of his reasoning was reduced to the fact that in our consciousness the picture of the world is nothing more than the product of the brain, created on the basis of the information he received from the senses.

However, no one guarantees that it is true, because vision, hearing smell, etc. often summarize us. In addition, the human brain, unfortunately, is a far from a perfect tool, and can also make a distortion in the picture of the reality around us. Simply put, Kant, and together with him all the philosophers who separated his point of view, rejected the real opportunity to have an objective judgment in matters relating to the world order. This includes the main difference between the views of the agnostics from the position of atheists, who were their opponents and, violently denying the Being of God, did not even admit the shadow of doubts about their right.

Conflicts

Both those and others have always joined and continue to conflict with believers, the number of which, according to sociological surveys, is consistently increasing. For people who recognize God the Creator of the World are equally ideological opponents and agnostics, and atheists. What is the difference between the reactions of the representatives of these two very numerous categories of persons to criticize their positions, which sometimes go into fierce attacks? We will talk about it especially.

As for the atheists, they never drove in disputes with believers, because they could not imagine any convincing arguments and always closed in their stubbornness. The discussion about the existence of God between atheists and believers, as a rule, was reduced to the fact that one of the parties was stubbornly, but completely unconstantly told: "There is!", While another repeated its own, there is also nothing to be found: "No! " As a result, they always became irreconcilable enemies.

The form that their confrontation took, depended on a number of external circumstances. So, in some historical periods, the ministers of the church with a light heart were sent to the fires of all who expressed doubts about the truth of religious dogmas. At the other stages of the development of society, militant atheists were shot and sent for the bars as the lady shepherds themselves and their parishioners.

Comfortable ideological position

In this regard, one can lead another difference of atheists from agnostics. It is that the latter never entered into an open conflict with servants of the Church. And this is not due to the lack of principle, but solely for the convenience of their position. Adherents of agnosticism in the dispute with churchmen always had the opportunity to "smooth the sharp corners", saying: "We fully admit that you are right, although we do not see that evidence."

The same they answered atheists. As a result, it was possible to maintain quite peaceful relations with both those and others. The position is definitely comfortable. She always gave the opportunity, formally not done by the principles, to avoid confrontation and not to give enemies. That is why atheists and agnostics are so peacefully for centuries. The difference between them is purely conditional. Some say: "We deny God," others say: "We cannot believe in his being", that, in fact, the same thing.

Intelligent selection of agnostic

In this regard, the question arises: in this case, the atheists prevent the atheists to avoid unnecessary attacks, because for this it is enough not to position itself as enemies of the church, but only to evade the practice of her teachings, referring to his unproducibility? Obviously, there may be two reasons. The first one, the name of the "intellectual choice", is that many of the atheists consider the theory of agnostics false, since, as they say, a mistake is in its very basis.

Atheists point out that, from the position of ontology, that is, the exercises on being as such, the question itself is incorrect. Proving the absence of anything, it is possible to give arguments relating only to a particular case, but at the same time not refuting the existence of this object as such. A simple example: In order to make sure that the rabbit is not hiding in a hat with a magician, it's enough to look in it. But even if it does not turn out there, it will not mean that rabbits do not exist at all in the world. Thus, attempts to proof the absence of God's exaccurate for atheists are unacceptable, since, in their opinion, are absurd.

Mathemary selection backgrounds

But in addition, the irreconcilable position of atheists is often determined by their moral choice. As life shows, the most rhythm of them are people, there are no time closely in contact with religion, but for one reason or another, not only those who have broken with it, but also become its opponents. There may be many such reasons, and their consideration is beyond the scope of this article.

It is only important that these people, in contrast to the followers of Cant and Yum, deliberately refuse to give their opponents the opportunity to even speculate about the proof of God's existence. It is precisely in this that, in fact, a major contradiction between the agnostics and atheists is concluded. What is the difference between their worldviews, becomes clear from the fact that representatives of one of these teachings adhere to materialistic views, while their opponents are convinced supporters of the Divine Creating World.