New criteria for live births of children. Number of children born alive in the past year Are born alive

". In this article, we will try, through spiritual research, to consider our life before birth, dividing it first into 2 parts:

• Part 1. Life before birth - time before conception
• Part 2. Life before birth - in time spent in the womb

The reason why we decided to publish the articles "Life before birth" and "Life after death" is that the content of these articles leads us to understand that how we live our life has inevitable consequences for us.

After the death of a person, his new birth on Earth does not depend on him (more precisely, on him). The possibility of being born on Earth is a very rare event. To enter the embryo, millions of subtle bodies compete for this opportunity, for the chance to come back to Earth and experience life in this world. But only one subtle body succeeds, which deserves to enter the embryo and be born again on Earth.

4. What factors determine when, where and in what family we are born on Earth?

Our birth on Earth is determined by two main factors:

1. Are the conditions on earth favorable to pay our bill according to ?
2. What region are we in before we are born on Earth?

4.1 The Give-and-Take Count and the New Birth.

Our give-and-take account Karma) is the only important determining factor:

• The time when we will be born on Earth and
• In what family we will be born, etc.

This account determines exactly our time of conception to the year, month, hour and second. This means that we are born at a period of time when it is most suitable for us to practice our counting. Thus, we are born on earth at the same time as the people with whom we have the greatest accounts or karma. This moment gives us the best external conditions on Earth. Let's look at the following example:

Mr. A fraudulently cheated Mr. B out of all his wealth. Thus Mr. A has earned a harmful give-and-take account with Mr. B. If A dies without paying his debt, he will have to be born again to pay off the ego. To repay the ego, he will either have to be born immediately while B is still alive, or he will have to wait until B is born again on Earth. However, if Mr. A has other bills to accumulate, then he will have to live one or more miserable lives until he can pay off all his debts. Therefore, he will have to be born in Hard times common enmity and global cataclysms. Naturally, he will not be able to be born in relatively prosperous times.

The main meaning of the law of "Give-Take" is not to determine the amount of stolen money that must be returned, but in the number of unhappiness units formed as a result of this deception. In the previous example, it looks like this: Mr. A caused Mr. B 1000 units of misfortune by his deceit, hence it is possible that Mr. A can be born the mother of Mr. B. As an attentive and obedient child, Mr. B will enjoy the love of his mother. Then he will suddenly die of an accident or a short-term illness at the age of, say, 10 years. This will happen at a time when the mother is very attached to the child and his untimely death will cause her 1000 units of misfortune and grief, now as a mother, and before Mr. A.

4.1.1 What determines how much of the accumulated debt will play a role in our destiny on Earth?

The same rule applies here, at birth that part of the accumulated Give-and-Take account will be taken, for which there are optimal conditions so that we can work it out in the coming life.

4.1.2 Can parents, through the spiritual practice of chanting, attract a more spiritually developed, sattvic subtle body (soul) for conception?

Yes, it is possible, thanks to spiritual practice, to attract the blissful, sattvic baby in the uterus. But only if the parents devote enough time, at least 4-5 hours a day to spiritual practice according to, as well as the body, mind and wealth in the service of God.

When parents practice spiritual practice, and the first soul in line (in accordance with the law of “Give and Take”) does not have sufficient qualities of goodness, then it will be replaced by the next one in this line, which is fully endowed with them. Such a child is usually very obedient, diligent and intelligent. In this case, it is also unlikely to give birth to a physically or mentally retarded child, due to the fact that the parents worked out his negative fate with their spiritual practice.

4.2.2 rebirth andfrom Paradise

If the subtle body is in Paradise, then it may have to wait a millennium before it is born again on Earth.

4.2.3 From Hell

In the lower zones of the Universe, such as Hell, the time of suffering lasts much longer. In addition, high-level negative beings cause the subtle bodies to engage in negative activities. As a result, they develop negative accounts (the law of "Give and take"), which contributes to their endless stay in these regions.

And only the subtle bodies from the first three zones of Hell, which were able to work out their share of suffering, are born again on Earth. Such an opportunity, to be born again from the 1st zone of Hell, only 1 out of 100,000 births succeeds. From the 2nd and 3rd zones of Hell even less often. In regions below 3rd, this possibility is almost non-existent.

Out of approximately 350,000 newborns daily, only three subtle bodies come from Hell, the rest are born from Purgatory, and only a few subtle bodies come from Paradise.

In rare cases, the subtle body can receive its very first birth on Earth, even in our current era. Since they have no accounts with anyone, all their actions are performed by their own choice. Since they don't have aja-tama impressions that affect the subconscious, they can use free will in choosing spiritual practice.

5. What is the length of time between death and rebirth on Earth?

There is no precisely-fixed time between death and rebirth on Earth. On average, this is from 50 to 400 years for subtle bodies from Purgatory. For example, subtle bodies from Paradise can wait for thousands of years.

Very rarely, when the subtle body of a deceased person immediately gets the opportunity to enter the womb again. If this happens, it is usually at three months of pregnancy, so the birth occurs after six months. The probability of such an event is 0.001% of all births.

In even rarer cases, the subtle body of a person who has just died can displace another subtle body from the nine-month-old flesh and be born immediately. In this case, the subtle body that displaces must be more spiritually developed and have a very large "Give-to-take" account with the family in which it will be born.

6. When is the next birth of a person decided?

For most people, the next rebirth is already determined at the time of their death of the life just lived, since most subtle bodies do not engage in spiritual practice in the other world. Spiritual practice is the only way to neutralize your Take-Give account or Karma. For most subtle bodies, this account remains unchanged due to their lack of spiritual practice.

Only for highly developed subtle bodies that come from Maharloka And Janaloka fate is decided at the moment of their birth because they themselves decide when they will be born on Earth. All other born subtle bodies are 100% connected with their destiny.

7. How many births have we already gone through?

The number of births of a person on Earth with a spiritual level of 20% for 1000 years

Note:

1. Number of years spent on Earth: 500 years
2. Number of years spent in Purgatory: 500 years

Please note that this refers to the subtle bodies that came from Purgatory. They could be born in various forms to suffer before being born in a human body.

8 Does a person know his fate or where he will be born again?

A person at the moment of conception does not know anything about the family in which he will be born. The probability of being forced out of the womb by another subtle body exists until the last moment. At the moment of birth, the subtle body knows about its accounts with the family where it will be born. This means that it understands what character this score is, positive or negative. Hence it means that the fate of the subtle body is not hidden from it.

9. Can we receive instructions from a highly developed body before our birth about what is expected of us?

No. Such instructions are not given.

10. What determines the sex of a child?

At the very first birth, the gender of the child is determined by God. From His point of view, gender is of great importance for the realization of the purpose of life, i.e. realize God.

After that, those who were born as a man continue to be born in the body of a man, if this left a positive imprint on the subconscious level. This is determined by the principle: "We are not interested in what we do not know." But if someone in his life had an interest in lesbianism or homosexuality, then in his next birth he will receive the body to which he had an attraction.

From the point of view of the give-and-take account, the gender of a person does not matter, since the same characteristics are present in both bodies, for example, anger, envy, etc. Also, being born a male is not a necessary benefit for God-realization i.e. union with God.

According to Spiritual Science, man and woman are no better or worse than each other. They rather represent one whole - the channel of the Sun ( surya nadi) and the channel of the Moon ( Chandra nadi) in the Universal Energy System ( Kundalini).

On the contrary, in the case, for example, if a woman wants to take revenge on her husband, a rapist who mocked her, then in her next life she will be born a man, and he a woman, and they will switch roles.

Again, it is not necessary to become a husband or wife to repay such a negative relationship. Already in this life, the husband can go through suffering in other ways in any other situations.

11. What determines whether an animal is born in a human body?

The possibility of an animal being born in a human body exists only if some person mocked the animal and in punishment to this person they change bodies in the next birth. No animal (that was originally born as an animal) evolves into a human body. Only if the subtle body that was in the human body, which received the body of an animal as a punishment for its actions and worked out this punishment, is born again from an animal in a human body. Rites performed for departed ancestors can help them in such situations.

But if the subtle body, in the body of an animal, has a strong desire to realize God, then it receives a human body earlier in order to engage in the desired spiritual practice. Some part of their suffering is released. Such people often have character traits similar to those of an animal in a previous birth, such as being angry (in a lion) and so on.

12. Can the ancestors of a certain family interfere with the process of the birth of the subtle body in this family?

Departed ancestors with a high spiritual level or ancestors under the influence of ghosts (devils and negative energy) with more high power like subtle sorcerers Mantriki) etc., can interfere with the fate of the subtle body, prevent its birth, or interfere with the process of obtaining a certain gender. For example, the birth of a boy in the family. In this case, the subtle body that was next in line for birth is born. Such actions of the ancestors are performed either out of a desire to attract attention to themselves, or as an act of revenge, etc.

Refer to the article: "Why do my ancestors want to cause me trouble?"

13. Generalization

What does this article mean for us?

• Most people throughout their lives strive for wealth, prestige, finding a special job, but few people know about the spiritual meaning of life and even less about life after death. Where the only value is our .
• From a spiritual point of view, being born on Earth as a human is the greatest fortune. This is the only area where we have the opportunity to engage in spiritual practice in order to overcome our destiny and eventually get out of the cycle of birth and death.
• In the present era, if we go to Purgatory, we will have to wait many centuries to be born again here on Earth. If we get to the Region of Hell, then the opportunity to be born on Earth may present itself to us only after thousands of years.
• Currently, on average, only 30% of us will go to Purgatory. The majority will go to the regions of Hell.
• At present, that is from 1999-2022, our world will experience a changing period, in an era of discord ( Kaliyug). This period is especially favorable for spiritual growth, where one year of spiritual practice can equal 50 years in any other period.
• As soon as in this life, as a result of spiritual practice, we will reach 60% samashti or 70% vyashti spiritual level, we will no longer have to return to Earth to work out our karma.

"Governor" by Andrey Moguchy on the "Golden Mask": opinions about the Moscow premiere

The dramatic program of the "Golden Mask" - 2018 was opened by the "Governor" Andrey Moguchiy. If in St. Petersburg last year's performance of the BDT, reviewed for COLTA.RU by Lilia Shitenburg, left the critics in unanimous delight, then after the Moscow screenings, the assessments were divided. In this "Governor" repeated the fate of other landmark achievements recent history Russian stage, forcing once again to think about the radical differences in the optics of the theatrical public in Moscow and St. Petersburg. At the request of the editors, the leading capital critics shared their opinions about the performance with us.

Alena Karas

First of all, the performance of the Mighty, in my opinion, returns to us an undeveloped historical experience. The fact that Leonid Andreev’s story “The Governor” is ideal for these purposes is a seemingly simple idea, but for some reason no one has yet thought of it. Meanwhile, this is exceptionally important prose, very expressive, denoting perhaps the main socio-psychological drama of the century: the personal responsibility of those in power. This collision permeates the performance through and through: from the prison of individual consciousness to the universal mystery. The genre of the production is impeccably thought out: Mighty paints a picture of the apocalypse, subtly working with its signs in culture - from Wim Wenders' Sky over Berlin to Jan Fabre's The Knight of Despair, from the images of Vakhtangov's Gadibook to Tadeusz Kantor's theater. It is no coincidence that The Governor ends with the words from Goya's Caprichos, brilliantly looping the dramaturgy of the performance: "The experience of the dead does not benefit those who are on the verge of death."

Marina Davydova

The simplest thing I can say about The Governor is that it makes an impression. To most of the public, anyway. It is really done spectacularly and inventively. First of all, this is the merit of the set designer Alexander Shishkin, but his work is inseparable from the work of the director. Andrey Moguchiy has always been as much an artist of his performances as a director. His visual fantasies were to a large extent the essence of this direction. And I remember how organically the artists of the Formal Theater he directed fit into the Brueghelian world of one of his best works, the play Between the Dog and the Wolf.

In The Governor, on the other hand, I always felt the contradiction between the bright, advanced scenography and the very archaic play of the artists, who for the most part continue to exist in the parameters of the Tovstonogov theater. Good or bad each of them exists, good or bad is in itself a separate issue. But stylistically they are in a different era. Scenography is in the 21st century, but they are still in the 20th.

In the same way, the story of Leonid Andreev remained in the 20th century - more precisely, at its very beginning. I remember that, according to the reviews of those who saw the premiere, Mighty's performance impressed them not only as a deep, existential statement, but also as an extremely topical statement addressed to today. It was perceived as a direct dialogue with the audience. That is, the story of Leonid Andreev, in the opinion of many, sounded extremely relevant. To be honest, I got exactly the opposite impression. All two hours, while the performance was on, I thought: how different is the reality that Andreev describes, and our today's reality. Where in modern Russia you will find representatives of the authorities who suffer from pangs of conscience, delve into themselves and experience a monstrous complex of guilt for what they have done? Where are the antagonistic authorities of the masses? Show me them! Where is the intelligentsia, which perceived the sufferings of the people as their own and felt their unity with the people? Where, finally, are those same revolutionaries whose revenge is relentlessly awaited main character? I go to court from time to time - it's clear which one. Sometimes it seems: just now the door will open, and some new Vera Zasulich will enter it. And he will do something in this courtroom, in which injustice hangs in the air so that you can literally cut it with a knife. But the door does not open, and no Vera Zasulich enters. And it won't come! All state criminals in this country can sleep peacefully. Nothing threatens them. Including pangs of conscience.

Have you ever seen the face of a judge pronouncing a knowingly unjust verdict? This is the face of a calm and self-complacent person. The whole social alignment over the past century has become completely different. We found ourselves in an inert society that cannot be stirred up. With representatives of power who have forgotten how to feel guilty. With the people who see enemies not in power, but in the "fifth column". And it seems to me that it would make sense to put Andreev's text in order to set off our time. Do not rhyme, namely shade. Even oppose. Through it, to reveal how the political and social face of the country in which we live has changed in more than a hundred years. But the creators of the play, it seems to me, did not have any of this in mind. If we ignore the social aspect, then in the performance (and in the story) there is sometimes a very interesting topic: how a person who is on the verge of death begins to see the world in a new way. How the proximity of death changes the optics through which you look at life. In Mighty, this theme breaks through social pathos, but still does not become central. However, if it became central, it would be better to stage not Andreev's story that remained in the 20th century, but the brilliant Death of Ivan Ilyich. She is just for all time.

Along with the directorial and scenographic innovations in the performance, the return to the model of the Russian psychological theater, to the direct Tovstonogov tradition, is obvious.

Anna Stepanova

I think the significance of this performance is very significant. "Governor" suddenly became a bridge between the best theater of the Soviet era of the 70s - early 80s and the current stage. It is important to remember that so far the situation has shown a failure, a confrontation between the new Russian theater and the previous tradition. The new Russian theater needed to discard the archaic, to take shape, to feel its strength - therefore, such a gap was inevitable.

It seems to me that today, after the new Russian, if you like, Russian, theater has become itself, having formed as an independent and integral artistic phenomenon, such an internal need has arisen to connect times. To connect aesthetically, too, because along with the directorial and scenographic innovations in the performance of Mighty, it is obvious a return to the model of the Russian psychological theater, to the direct Tovstonogov tradition, when the theater, with the whole system of the performance, climbed into the skin of the hero, plunged into the depths of his soul.

In The Governor, a return to another important aspect is noticeable - ethical. The new Russian theater needed the utmost freedom, including from the narrow moral judgments of socialist realism. But today the scene is clearly occupied with the search for a new ethic. And the ruthlessness towards man, which the new theater revealed at the stage of its formation, was replaced by Mighty's deep understanding of him. In The Governor, the director returned to the public the right to empathy, to empathy, but by no means in the old, old ways, with the rise of the right and the debunking of the guilty. The Mighty One has deprived this construction of the moment of justification for anyone. In The Governor, the hero himself does not forgive himself, does not justify himself - but he realizes the justice of retribution. Moreover, he pays for the blindness of the former official and general, who, as if by fate or pure fate, pushed by the arm to give a signal for the execution of the demonstrators. After he was horrified by what he had done, a living, suffering person was born from a functionary - exactly as in Ulyukaev's last speech. And then everything fell into place.

Zara Abdullaeva

Unrest in narrow circles was caused only by deceived expectations - after all, it was reported from St. Petersburg that this was an event of the year and the city. In Moscow, the performance did not go, it fell apart - I was at the first [of two shows as part of the Golden Mask]. The matter, of course, is alive, but all the same: failure. A mechanical set of rides, quite mossy. What does Magritte's characters in bowlers have to do with it? They are eaglets, personifying, presumably, the Order of the White Eagle. But who understands this symbolism? Well, yes, there is a dialogue, so to speak, with silent films. Is that why the off-screen voice is turned on, retelling the plot, which is utterly outdated? Of course, this performance is an anachronism. But he could at least be good-natured, not pretentious and naive. Here, the techniques of the median theater-theatre for a civilized, probably, public are being exploited. The one who is tired of going to pop music, and bored to the conceptual theater in her own city. To make it more fun, close-ups of artists and non-stage people are being introduced on the screens, broken glass, light compulsions, loud shots, schoolgirls and snow. A futile precaution. I propose to introduce a moratorium on snow and rain on the stage - not only in memory of Streler's Campiello.

Indisputable, however, is the elaborate high cost of the scenery. She just stared at them, remembering Protazanov's 1928 silent film [White Eagle], where fear and horror were not an imitation. Meyerhold played the Petersburg dignitary, and Kachalov played the lecherous governor, devoid of conscience.

Kristina Matvienko

The “Governor” by Andrey Moguchiy, released exactly a year ago, made an impression: by its scale, directness of the topic taken, technological impeccability. There was something paradoxically cheerful in it, balancing the pathos associated with the plot of Leonid Andreev and the centenary of the revolution. There was also a compromise in The Governor - between the natural radicalism of the director's style of Mighty and the colossus of a large drama theater. That is, everything formed into a perfect picture - but within the framework of the mainstream. In this context, The Governor is a significant, important performance, and it is not placed in another one, so we need to talk about it, given this context.

Now doctors will have to fight for the lives of babies born at the gestational age from 22 weeks with a weight of 500 grams
Until now, the registry offices have registered live births with a body weight of 1000 g or more.

Those born alive with a body weight of 500 to 999 g were subject to registration with the registry office as live births if they lived more than 168 hours after birth.
If such a child died without having lived these hours, the death was not registered. such a child was considered newborns, but fruit.

President of the National Medical Chamber, Director of the Moscow Research Institute of Emergency Children's Surgery and Traumatology Leonid Roshal believes that the introduction of new standards will give impetus to the development of pediatrics, resuscitation, intensive care and other areas of medicine in Russia.

Russian doctors reacted very ambiguously to this innovation. http://abbottgrowth.ru/doctors/tables/list.aspx?tmid=9&tid=9082&p=3#220041

1. It causes concern that far from everyone settlements Russia has conditions for nursing such children.
2. All indicators of the work of obstetricians and neonatologists will sharply deteriorate, since the mortality rate among such children will be very high.
3. There are fears that such children, most often, will be "inferior". Like, these disabled people will become a burden for mothers and residents of orphanages.

It seems to me that it is necessary to introduce new criteria.
And that's why:
1. Money will be allocated for this program and this will make it possible to better equip the clan. at home, intensive care units in them

2. Obstetricians, neonatologists, resuscitators will have to improve.
Demand from them will be stricter.
After all, if they begin to punish for not nursing a 500-gram child, then for the death of a full-weight and born on time, they will be shot in the backyard by the garbage heap.
I agree with the principle that in Russia, in order to achieve at least some results, it is necessary to set difficult, sky-high goals.
These goals may not be achieved, but things will get off the ground.

3. And do not decide everything for the parents! Parents are different.
For example, we actively operate on infants with hydrocephalus (of various origins). When we started doing this many years ago, we were told the same way, wringing our hands: “Oh, experiment, oh, and parents will cry, why prolong the life of handicapped people? … etc.
It turned out that many of them survive and develop normally and the mothers are happy.
Of course, if they are sane mothers.
There are also those who abandon such children, marinate them at home, (one burned a seven-month-old in the oven) ... and so on.
But do we have to focus our work on these cannibals?
It seems to me that every life is valuable. We did not give it and it is not for us to decide who lives and who does not.
When they want to do something, they look for opportunities; when they don’t want to, they look for reasons.

"Life-born Sovereign"

I watched the video “My address is the SOVIET UNION. Answers by Vyacheslav Negreba”, and here again, in questions from the people, a certain topic is raised about “Live-born Sovereigns”. Yes, the people are interested in this topic, and this is a fact that we, the people, the builders of the “New World”, so to speak, cannot ignore ...

Here, for example, “Saburov”, so to speak, caught the “message”, this can be seen from the video “ALL NATIONAL CATHEDRAL in Vladimir on April 21. INFORMATION about the Trade Union for ALL LIVES”… I don’t want some kind of “dirt” here, to pour “Saburov” on this person, and so far even his desire to “unify the people” seems very convincing, but I see a lot of initial mistakes in his endeavors. Perhaps these mistakes are from some misunderstanding of the essence of things, but it is also possible that some personal and selfish interests are again behind this. Here, in this movement “For the Power of the People”, I already see the “self-name” as doubtful. And here it seems to me that there is still such an option that there is someone who still wants to sort of hide "Behind" this very "People's Power". Well, okay, in time everything will become clear ...

And here I want to say a little on the topic of "Live-born Sovereigns" ...

The people here in this topic, so to speak, "confuse the coast", and dump everything in a heap. Here, to understand things, it is necessary to divide this phrase into two individual words. And you need to start with the Russian word "Live-born". Yes, the “Birth Certificate” fully testifies to the fact that a person was born alive. The first such certificate, the primary document (Form N103 / y), is the “Certificate of a live-born (boy / girl) person / person”. Here we note that this little living person does not have a “face” and a “name”, that is, they are not registered in the primary document (Form N103 / y). But this little living person, already by the right of the fact that he was born alive, is a “Subject of Natural Law”, a kind of small owner, for example, if he was born on the land of Ukraine, he is already the owner of the right to:

« Earth, її nadra, atmospheric cover, radio frequency resource, water and other natural resources, which are located in the borders of the territory of Ukraine, natural resources of the continental shelf, exclusive (marine) economic zone (further - natural resources of Ukraine) є ob'єkt people »

And it doesn't matter where this person was "BORN", by the fact of birth, each in some of his share, is the owner of natural resources. Here he is given the right to do this not by some “state”, on the basis of some “written laws”, but by “God the Most High - Heavenly Father”, that “Spirit”, some small part of which is the “Spark of God”, and is present in this living physical body, and revitalizes it. When this “Spark” for some reason leaves the physical body, here the physical body becomes “dead”. But it was not the man who died, it was the “life-giving Spirit”, who left his “physical body”, and the man is simply in this moment became an “impersonal entity”, so to speak, lost his physical body, and, accordingly, his “face” ...

What "face"?

And now, our parents endow our little live-born little man with a “name”, but they cannot give him a “face”, this little man must make a “face” for himself when he grows up, then he starts to show his will, becomes capable in social interactions, only here he acquires a certain “face” visible to other people, that is, he becomes a “personality”. And here it doesn’t matter at all what this “person - personality” will be, good or bad, here the main thing is to show some kind of vital activity in the circle of their own kind, and people from the outside will already see what this “person” is ...

And now we will consider, from some other point of view, the birth of our little man with a possible “name”, but so far without a “face”. Whose parents, being aware of what they are doing, or, no, “endowing”, our little man with a certain “physical person”. Based on the certificate of Form N103 / y, registering in the registry office, on paper in the "Registry Office Book" the "name" given to him.

And now, in the so-called "jurisprudence", this "registered name" is called " legal name of an individual ”, which in the future will appear in the courts as a kind of identifier tied to the living person himself. And now, it is the registrar who becomes a kind of guardian and, so to speak, a human rights activist of our " subject of natural law " namely " legal name of an individual ”, and if everything is honest, in positive law, then in essence this living little man, for him all this is not so bad. In the USSR, in our country, it was all, if I can say so quite honestly, in positive law, although not quite, if we consider this issue more deeply. But provided that everything was just in conscience and justice, here in the USSR, we were born "citizens" of this "Collective Agreement in the "face of the USSR". That is, when registering a child in the registry office, parents put their signatures somewhere, as if signing for a small child, making him a full signatory of the “USSR Treaty” - a “Citizen of the USSR”, to which a “personal account” was immediately opened, and his share, as a "subject of natural law", was put on the balance sheet of the state - the "USSR Treaty". Everything seems to be wonderful, since we are all citizens of the USSR, we were considered co-founders of this agreement, and this agreement contained the concept of “collective property”. Here I will not talk about “labor” as the personal property of every living person, so as not to “climb into the jungle”, this is, as it were, a separate issue, but here in the USSR, our labor, practically did not belong to us personally, either, but was part of this very "collective property" ...

What do we have now, when we understand that we are not citizens of some newly formed on the infrastructure of the USSR, allegedly the states of "RF", "Ukraine" and others?

Here I will not talk about where our "Collective Property" has gone. But now we are looking at who is born in our modern so-called "registry offices", supposedly "states" that do not exist. The signs remained, in which the "zombies" still "believe", and the contractual essence seems to have not changed, all these "RF", "Ukraine" and other collective entities, so to speak, are "Treaties", under which we people, as it were, all subscribed. And this fact is confirmed by the personal signature of each in the so-called "Passport" document of these "Collective agreements" - "RF", "Ukraine" and others. Yes, here these passports have two functions, as an identity card, and as evidence of a signatory of the "Collective Agreement" - "RF", "Ukraine" and others. Which, in turn, were given to us citizens of the USSR against our will, fraudulently, but for what purposes we already know ...

Everything, over the years, all of our “Collective property belonging to the“ USSR Treaty ”was looted and sold with giblets, along with real estate and people. All of us, who are the signatories of the modern "Collective agreements" - "RF", "Ukraine" and others, in fact, are all "slaves" now. And children registered under these "Collective Agreements" - "RF", "Ukraine" and others, immediately receive the "legal name of an individual." Citizens have not been born since 1991, now instead of "citizens" in these "trade conglomerates" "slaves" are born. A “personal account” is also opened on them, but with a certain negative balance, equal to the share of credit debts accumulated by these “Collective Agreements” for the entire time of its existence. That is, this is the “debt” that, for example, the “state of Ukraine”, has accumulated by taking the so-called “loans from the IMF”. And other loans throughout its existence. And it turns out all this is so because in the so-called "Collective agreements - states" the form of ownership has changed, from "Collective" to "Private" ...

That is, here, it turns out like this, of course, all this was done fraudulently, and yet, the parents “pissed off”, so to speak, all the property of the USSR accumulated by grandfathers and fathers, and drove their children into the “be from enlightened slavery. And their children continue to give birth " live births ", and quickly rush to register them under some legitimate "Collective Agreement", depriving them of " natural law ", and endowing with accumulated debts, making them " stillborn in law », « slaves »…

The plot is pretty twisted, isn't it?

So it’s impossible to say that the topic of “live-borns” is nonsense, it turns out that it’s not such nonsense, and the people feel it in their gut, but they don’t know and don’t understand how to get rid of it. And those of the people who are still "under anesthesia by the media" are, these are "zombies - the dead." These "zombies - the dead", in the image of the "Game of Thrones", apparently do not even suspect what was said here above ...

And it’s easy to get free, and we have living examples of this in Ukraine, everything has been tested in practice, and everything works, today and now, and everything is honest without selling “certificates of live births” for the purpose of profit, but with their extradition, and action in International law, which has real weight ...

Who are these people who issue such “certificates of live births”?

These are those who, so to speak, in our Ukrainian “war resisted, and I wish them success in life” ...

These are “Contractual Territorial Communities”, which issue “Birth Certificates”, “Certificates of the Subject of Natural Law” to themselves in the circle of the community, to their “live-born little men”, and register them in their own community, in their registers. I am attaching samples of the aforementioned standard documents to this article, but I think that they may still require some refinement, and translation into others, including Russian, because these samples are one of the first developed.

Applications:

1. « » ( Certificate about the people of the child ).
2. « » ( TITLE OF POWER on the natural resources of Ukraine ).
3. « » ( CERTIFICATE about sleeping power ).

QUESTION ABOUT EARTH

http://dabsoqac.owlhost.link/wp_solidaria/press-monitor/vopros-o-zemle/

RIGHT TO LAND

http://dabsoqac.owlhost.link/wp_solidaria/press-monitor/pravo-na-zemlyu/

ECONOMIC LAW

http://dabsoqac.owlhost.link/wp_solidaria/press-monitor/ekonomicheskoe-pravo/

Now, this is about live births. And here it’s not worth running and rushing about with all sorts of statements of disobedience, with refusals from the TIN, and other things. Here a competent approach is needed, since it is still necessary to contact the “Old World”, conduct trade there, resolve economic issues and all that. Well, here, if a lot of people understood all this, then everything would quietly flow without bloodshed into the people's economy, from the “slave-hunter”, something like Marat Kharisov. He talks a lot about it in his videos...

So the issue with the living must be raised and interpreted from the right position, from the side of the communities. In Ukraine at one time and step by step instructions they wrote how this is all done, all these developments are available as approximate options, only at this time, taking into account and understanding some mistakes, here the emphasis and emphasis should be placed on international law. It is higher than any constitution on post-Soviet space, as well as take everything good from the legislative base of the USSR, how to create cooperatives, well, everything that we need is there, and use it as internal documents for leadership on the basis of people's communities. And to return the USSR, in the form it was, from all legislative framework this is a utopia...

Now as for Sovereigns and Sovereignty…

Here, in no case, at first, no such documents are needed en masse, this is a type of trap for suckers, here a high level of understanding and consciousness is needed in the topic of Sovereignty. Sergei Danilov correctly told in his latest videos who the Sovereign is. Sovereign is in Russian "Independent person". And then the “slaves in the right”, rush about and want their uncle to write out a piece of paper “Sovereign” for them. It's kind of funny, to say the least. An “independent person” is also a “Sovereign” because he does not need anyone, so that someone writes something to him. The sovereign is the one who makes all the attributes for himself, certificates and seals, and what is called "money", including ...

What exactly is Sovereignty?

“Sovereignty”, the topic is quite confusing and not very simple, but at this time, without understanding it properly, and without understanding its essence, it is impossible to become a free and independent person ...

And so, for example, someone decided to look into this issue. He begins to look for the meaning of the word in dictionaries, on the Internet, and what kind of explanation does he find there?

On demand on the Internet: What is Sovereignty?

Sovereignty (through GermanSauverä nitä t from fr.souveraineté - supreme power, supremacy, domination) - independence of the state in external and supremacy state power in internal affairs.

masculine

The term is also used to refer to this concept. state sovereignty. Complete independence of the state in its internal affairs and in the conduct of foreign policy.

Everything, you will not find more special explanations without devoting more time to this issue. And this is definitely exactly what the "slaves" need to know on this issue. Type supreme power, supremacy, dominance , and then everything smoothly slides down to the word state , further and further all the "slaves" understand that supreme power, dominion , allegedly belong only to the state, this is its attribute, and therefore this state has the right to do with them “slaves”, whatever it wants.

And for those who do not think so, below I will try to explain more deeply the essence of the word "Sovereignty", thereby saving the reader's time associated with an independent search for the real essence of this word.

Let's start with the fact that any state, so to speak, is created by people, and if these people are not sovereign, can the state created by them have “Sovereignty”? I think the answer is clear...

So, "Sovereignty" begins with "Sovereign", that is, with an independent person - "Personality", in singular, and here it is - "Individual Sovereignty". And already the concept - "State sovereignty", refers to the so-called - "Collective Sovereign", formed on the basis of the "Collective agreement" between the "Individual Sovereigns", the agreement itself here is called the state. Here we can say that the "Sovereign" has two types: 1. "Individual Sovereign", 2. "Collective Sovereign", and here without the first, the second simply cannot exist. Although state sovereignty, may already be possible in the presence of a single "Sovereign Personality" in the state, but in this case it must have a certain power (for example, Monarchy).

What exactly is a Sovereign?

The sovereign is a kind of "abstract construction" that can have various "forms", but any of the forms implies a certain hierarchy, the presence supremacy. Here, if, for example, we take the “physical body” of a person, then it is clear that the head, that is, the brain, should be the supreme ruler of this entire body. Although it may be otherwise, but in this case, the given word - "Sovereign" can be forgotten, and no longer remembered about it. For a complete understanding"abstract design" phrases " Individual Sovereign ”, said above regarding the “physical body” of a person, is absolutely not enough. Although the usual individuals”, nothing else, for certain reasons, in the head on this account just doesn't come.

Who really has the upper hand in"abstract design" phrases " Individual Sovereign?

The supremacy in this construction, limited by the framework of individual consciousness, is the spirit, which animates its “physical body”. Spirit refers to the impersonal part of this construction, representing in it only a certain part of the general Impersonal Spirit, which gives life to all living things in the Universe. In the human world, this Impersonal Universal Spirit, in other words, is called the Heavenly Father. Without this element - a certain part of the "impersonal spirit" in the abstract construction " Individual Sovereign ”, Further fabrications are meaningless, that is, from the word - Absolutely. This Supreme Ruler is the “impersonal Spirit” in the design “ Individual Sovereign ”, is its immortal essence, and is, so to speak, the emitter of the “physical body”, which it creates to help itself within the framework of the material “physical world”.

In fact the owner of the Supremacy in"abstract design" phrases " Individual Sovereign ”is the Impersonal Spirit, but since its Consciousness is Impersonal (SuperConsciousness), and includes, according to the principle of a certain nesting, a part of the personal consciousness of the human soul, then it must be assumed that“ Individual Sovereign ", this is what the human soul means, because:

“Human consciousness and individuality are inextricably linked with each other, and even more than that, taken separately, they appear to be meaningless concepts, because individuality is the nature of consciousness, consciousness is always individual . Consciousness and individuality, affirming the very existence of the Monad as such, are born with the beginning of the assertion of the Monad as a prototype of the relative world inherent in it. Being by its nature a part of the Universal Spirit, the Monad by its consciousness is an aspect of the Cosmic Divine Consciousness; affirming itself as an independent independent substance of the second kind, the Monad thereby affirms its inherent consciousness. (V. Shmakov. The Holy Book of Thoth).

But the question of individual Sovereignty, "illiterate slaves", is beyond the power. Firstly, here it is necessary to "break" all the so-called "state" agreements, not to demand anything from these states, and to have as little relations with them as possible. And how it is alone, perhaps, we, so to speak, live inside these “gangster formations”. So there is no need to talk about complete independence in such conditions. This is like a “hetman’s man”, but the sad case of Sergei Razumovsky is here as an example for us, he did not understand correctly, or misunderstood the word “sovereignty”. And there, stronger “Personal Sovereigns” were found, who, in principle, seized control and “slowed down” the Idea of ​​the “Confederation of the United Peoples”. And they tried to chatter and confuse all this in popular undertakings. And together with the ATO, they succeeded. And most of the “communities” are now “in Ukraine”, they are not really communities, they are not “Collective Sovereigns”, as they are registered under the jurisdiction and “in the agreement Ukraine”, which in turn is also not a “Sovereign Collective Agreement” » for the entire population of Ukraine.

An “independent person”, an “Individual Sovereign” is possible at the present time and in our conditions only to be in the circle of a self-sufficient community, or some kind of association of several communities. Here it can be imagined as a “Mop Husband”, such a person can be given a certain document of an “Independent Person (Sovereign)”, as a kind of mandate that defines powers, but along the way in a self-sufficient community, in internal affairs, there is no sense in such a document, except perhaps what kind of external affairs between communities and other "collective entities" to conduct ...

But at the initial stage, such registration (999) on an international scale is probably needed, I don’t know exactly how this mechanism works, but if it were necessary, then we have all this in Ukraine, and there are people who could do it would help. It's kind of like an international registration as a " Legal entity”, it has in connection with this some kind of registration (999), in the “extraterritorial non-commercial space”. I have already seen such a similar picture here, with the “Sovereign People of Ukraine”. There, near all this, Sergey Razumovsky was also spinning, he also wanted to reach the World level according to such a scheme, for which he paid the price, like the “Jews” did not understand him, and the “people” did not support him, since, to this day, there is not much understands. But it all came from the “Ordinary People” who understand this issue, and the scheme here was much cooler in its structure (confederal, reinforced concrete - not killed), in principle, according to some statements, which is why the war in Ukraine happened .

« sovereign »

The benefit of the developments of the Sovereigns is a legal mechanism for solving their own problems - without regard to state structures. I.e. complete exit from the tax burden of officials. Alas, those who have big "money" - including the first persons of the state, politicians, etc., have already taken advantage of this in the first place. They pay 1% to the central office of the Sovereigns (its founder, Oleg Brylev) - and this is enough for them to live a comfortable life ...

Now these guys from the Ordinary people have abandoned this idea, at that time Evgeny Gigauri (coordinator) collaborated with them, his project “White KON”, this is a kind of graphic part of this Confederate structure. Then the site with the “White CON” project disappeared along with the server, as well as the organizational project of communities (communities), for what reasons this happened, one can only guess ... now the “White CON” project is launched again, but the so-called “people” cannot wake up from the “media anesthesia”…

As for the creation of the Community, the mechanisms and explanations are set out here:
THE QUESTION OF POWER OF THE PEOPLE. Should, and how can a "cook" govern the state? - http://midgard-edem.org/?p=3924

For a person, the will is enough, and that's all the sovereignty that is needed to create a "Collective Sovereign", the main thing here is the right approach is needed so that with an understanding of this "Sovereignty" all those who express their will are. And not just to give everyone in a row without any understanding, such as the documents of the “Sovereign”, or “the will of a person”, which means that this topic needs to be covered somehow ...

With "Sovereignty" here, at first, you need to be more careful, but at the expense of the "live-born person", you need to somehow link this issue in connection with the communal movement and the movement of the USSR. And now, when territorial people's communities will be created on the ground, and a certain center of movement will be formed in the extraterritorial space Let's call it "CON - New World", then it will already be possible to think about some "Passports", documents in which there will be all information about a person, both living and sovereign, and here it should rather be called not “Passport”, but “Certificate” ...

STAGED CREATION OF A COMMUNICATION STRUCTURE USSR, KOH - New world, CON (Pact of United Nations), Road Rat(or other interested Organization).