The power of thought can change the genetic code of an organism. Is it possible to change DNA and edit human genes DNA according to official science?

“The information underlying Iissiidiology is designed to radically change your entire current vision of the world, which, together with everything that is in it - from minerals, plants, animals and humans to distant Stars and Galaxies - is in reality unimaginably complex and an extremely dynamic Illusion, no more real than your dream today."

Table of contents:

1. Introduction

1. Introduction

The question of the relationship between the factors of heredity and upbringing in the process of formation of the human personality, especially in the formation of a complex of humanism traits, often caused frantic debate. Science indisputably proves that these factors are inextricably linked: hereditary capabilities can only be realized under the influence of the external environment, and the influence of the external environment and factors is always limited to individual hereditary capabilities.

It turns out to be a kind of vicious circle. Is it so? To what extent are these two factors interdependent on each other? Is it possible to influence hereditary possibilities? If yes, then how? These and many other questions arise as a result of the collision of these scientific approaches.

This paper provides answers to these questions through a comparative analysis of the knowledge of such scientific fields as genetics, epigenetics, as well as isisidiology, which is a new system of knowledge that interprets many scientific fields using more universal concepts. That is, those ideas that form the basis of Iissiidiology, in my opinion, reveal additional facets that science lacks in understanding the essence of higher-level tasks and issues and help expand the boundaries of human capabilities.

Many people know that aesthetic education and appropriate environmental conditions are absolutely necessary for the humanization of the individual. However, in order for this influence to be most effective and targeted, so that every person can realize his potential to the maximum for the benefit of others, it is also necessary to know the hereditary mechanisms for the manifestation of all hidden abilities archived in the structure of DNA and in a person’s self-awareness.

2. A look at genetic information from the perspective of genetics and issiidiology

2.1. DNA in the views of official science

First, we need to consider what DNA and the genetic code are from the point of view of genetics.

At the beginning of this millennium, an event of exceptional importance occurred: the human genome was deciphered - the instructions describing our structure. The genome decoding project was launched in 1990 under the leadership of James Watson (molecular biologist, geneticist) under the auspices of the US National Health Organization. A working draft of the genome structure was released in 2000, the complete genome was released in 2003, however, even today additional analysis of some sections has not yet been completed. The goal of the project was to understand the structure of the genome of the human species, determine the sequence of nucleotides that make up DNA, and identify 25-30 thousand genes in the human genome.

In the nucleus of every cell in our body there is a control center - DNA, the program for the evolution of all living beings. The code of this giant thread-like molecule contains important information that regulates cell activity and passes on hereditary traits from generation to generation. It can change as a result of mutations, which can be positive and change it in a direction favorable for the body, or in an unfavorable one, or even destructive in certain cases. This information contained in DNA consists of a sequence of nucleotides (adenine, guanine, thymine and cytosine) forming a set of triplets (codons) that determine the order of amino acids in the protein molecule.

The discovery of nucleic acids belongs to the Swiss chemist F. Miescher, who for a long time studied the nuclei of leukocytes that make up pus. The painstaking work of a remarkable researcher was crowned with success. In 1869, F. Miescher discovered a new chemical compound in leukocytes, which he called nuclein (Latin nucleus - nucleus). Further research showed that nuclein is a mixture of nucleic acids. Subsequently, nucleic acids were found in all plant and animal cells, bacteria and viruses. And so it turned out that in nature there are two types of nucleic acids: deoxyribonucleic and ribonucleic. The difference in names is explained by the fact that the DNA molecule contains the sugar deoxyribose, and the RNA molecule contains ribose.

To obtain a complete picture, it is necessary to describe what a gene is (from the Greek genos - genus, origin), as a structural element of this macromolecule, which is an elementary unit of heredity, representing a certain specific sequence of nucleotides in DNA.

In the genome of each human cell there are about 30-40 thousand genes, which are located on chromosomes, divided into sections - loci, that is, the location of a particular gene. As a result of sequencing the entire set of genomic DNA, it was established that the human genome contains 25-30 thousand active genes encoding proteins and functional RNA, which constitutes only 1.5% of the total genetic material. The rest is non-coding DNA, often called "junk DNA".

The human genome consists of 23 pairs of chromosomes, where each chromosome contains hundreds of genes separated by intergenic space. The intergenic space contains regulatory regions and non-coding DNA.

Genes encode information about the biosynthesis of one polypeptide chain with a specific amino acid sequence and about the structure of RNA molecules: matrix or informational (coding proteins), ribosomal, transport and some other types of so-called non-coding RNA. The average size of a human gene is 30,000 base pairs. The shortest genes contain only two dozen nucleotide letters, for example, the genes for endorphins - proteins that cause a feeling of pleasure. The genes for interferons, proteins that protect humans from viral infections, are about 700 nucleotides in size. The longest gene encoding one of the muscle proteins, dystrophin, contains 2.5 million nucleotide pairs.

They perform several functions, one of which is encoding the primary structure of the polypeptide (protein). In each cell (except for erythrocytes, which lack a nucleus), genes encoding enzymes for DNA replication and repair, transcription, components of the translation apparatus (ribosomal proteins, r-RNA, t-RNA, aminoacyl synthetases and other enzymes), enzymes for ATP synthesis and others work. components necessary for maintaining the “housekeeping” of the cell. About one-fifth of all genes are responsible for housekeeping. Most genes in each cell are silent. The set of active genes varies depending on the type of tissue, the period of development of the organism, and the received external or internal signals. We can say that each cell “sounds” its own chord of genes, determining the spectrum of m-RNAs synthesized, the proteins they encode and, accordingly, the properties of the cell.

DNA itself is not directly involved in protein synthesis, but serves as a template for constructing a messenger or messenger RNA molecule into which the gene code is transmitted (transcription). In ribosomes, the m-RNA code is “translated” into the amino acid sequence of the protein synthesized on them (translation).

2.2 Comparison of DNA structure from the point of view of issiidiology and genetics

DNA, as a structure that ensures storage, transmission from generation to generation and implementation of the genetic development program, from the point of view of issiidiology, is also considered as an information base about all existing forms. The evolution of humans and many other forms of life is associated with many factors, one of which is the inclusion in our DNA of relationships characteristic of other forms of self-consciousness (proto-forms): animals, plants, minerals, and so on. Iissiidiology interprets that part of DNA, which scientists call working, as relationships of varying degrees of covariance (similarity) between different types of proto-forms, that is, working on the basis of different protoform sfuurmm-forms (representations), reformatted into the human type of thinking. In our body, all possible functions of organs and systems are represented by thousands of protoform genes; including viruses and bacteria. It is important to note here that the human body is not only a collection of several trillion human cells itself, but also more than 100 trillion bacterial, viral and fungal forms of self-awareness. As you can see, so far in this bio-conglomerate of life, the creators of the human genome are not dominant at all, since in terms of the total number of various DNA structures in our bodies, the leaders are the creators of protoform (other forms of self-consciousness) cells that structure our bodies in abundance.

That is, from the above we can conclude that the genetic code, represented by a multimillion-dollar sequence of nucleotides, contains not only human, but also experience characteristic of other forms of self-consciousness (proto-forms), received by different representatives of the kingdoms of nature in certain living conditions.

The formation of all kinds of different types (different protoform) relationships is possible due to the principles that are described in Iissiidiology. One of them is the principle of diffusivity.

Diffusion(from lat. diffusio- propagation, spreading, mutual penetration of particles of matter into each other with partial transfer of their individual properties to the resulting state) allows the form-creators of some proto-forms to form the necessary basis of energy-informational relationships by attracting additional information fragments that structure the focal dynamics of other proto-forms.

Each self-conscious being, manifested in the surrounding space, carries out different-quality transformations in the focal dynamics of its consciousness due to the introduction of multi-protoform relationships (information fragments), which, interacting with certain sections of DNA, converted into an electrical impulse, are reprojected along neural pathways for further deciphering into such sections brain, such as the pineal gland, hypothalamus, pituitary gland and so on. As a result, the ideas and images necessary for further development are formed, that is, experience is integrated that corresponds to the quality of the form configuration.

Thus, all existing types of proto-forms, including people, through transgression into the common information field of their own experience of sfuurmm-forms, participate in the evolution (amplification) of each other in the chosen direction of development. This is the evolutionary essence of diffusivity, that is, the ability to continuously reproject all the experience gained between all existing forms by making certain choices that contribute to the universalization of perception and improving the quality of psychomental processes.

An important link that also explains the mechanism for integrating heterogeneous experience in the structure of genes is the photonic nature of the DNA of any living organism, the photonic-wave basis of which allows it to interact with the DNA of all other forms of self-consciousness (animal, plant and mineral kingdoms). That is, everything that is individually thought, felt and uniquely experienced at any point on the globe by a person, animal, plant, mineral, at the same moment is projected into the resonantly corresponding wave sections of the DNA of all other living organisms, regardless of the distance from they are located at the location of the event.

Some recent scientific research also suggests a connection between the information field and DNA. In 1990, a group of Russian physicists, molecular biologists, biophysicists, geneticists, embryologists and linguists began studying certain parts of DNA. By irradiating samples of this macromolecule with a laser, they discovered that it attracts and, like a sponge, absorbs light and stores its photons in the form of a spiral. This was further proven by the fact that the wave pattern remained in the same place where the irradiated sample was located, the light continued to spiral, although physically the DNA was no longer there. Many control experiments showed that the DNA energy field existed on its own, as an energy twin, since the resulting wave pattern took on the same shape as the physical molecule and existed after the sample was removed.

The Chinese doctor Jiang Kanzheng speaks about this in his work “The Theory of Field Control”. He substantiated the possibility of direct transmission of information from one brain to another using radio waves and confirmed it with numerous experiments. " Previously, it was believed that the carrier of genetic information is DNA, the molecules of which contain the genetic code, but the achievements of modern physics allowed me to assume that DNA is only a “cassette” with recording information, and its material carrier is bioelectromagnetic signals. In other words, the electromagnetic field and DNA are a combined genetic material that exists in two forms: passive - DNA and active - EM field. The first preserves the genetic code that ensures the stability of the body. The second one is able to change it. To do this, it is enough to influence bioelectromagnetic signals, which simultaneously contain energy and information. By their nature, such signals are moving photons, which, according to quantum theory, have corpuscular-wave properties».

Based on this theory, an installation was created that “reads” information from the DNA of one living object and sends it to another living object. In one of the experiments, he exposed the electromagnetic field of a melon to sprouted cucumber seeds. The grown fruits had the taste of the donor - melon, and biochemical analysis showed that corresponding changes had occurred in the DNA, which were passed on from generation to generation.

Conducting a number of such experiments in genetics allowed researchers to suggest that the genetic codes of an organism may not be located in the DNA molecule at all, but in an energy - photon-wave - twin.

2.3. We are able to change hereditary information

After revolutionary and cutting-edge research in science and genetics in recent years, we are now approaching a new and very interesting frontier, behind which there is even more valuable information about the influence of thoughts on human health and psyche. This new frontier is where issiidiology, genetics and epigenetics meet, and where science and self-healing come together.

At this stage, we ask new questions: How do our thoughts and emotions influence the perceptual mechanisms and signals within our genes? How can we use this information to heal ourselves?

Scientists are increasingly pointing out that the human genome and the activity of many genes are influenced by external factors and behavioral reactions. Depending on the degree of quality and stability of a person’s psychomental reactions to information coming from outside, the corresponding sections of genes are activated, which leads to changes in physiological processes, the emergence of new signs in behavior, in the psyche (configuration), which become stable over time. But, on the other hand, there is also an opposite opinion in the scientific community: the degree of harmony of psychomental processes occurring in a person’s self-consciousness is influenced by hereditary information and often (to a greater extent) by expressing genes that work due to the influence of those epigenetic markers that are transmitted from generation to generation. And from an issiidiological position, as I understand it, this influence is considered as an interdependent and complementary process, but requiring further research in the field of genetics, epigenetics, and psychology.

Through the specificity of processes of different quality occurring in genes, information not only about external features and the state of functional activity of a biological organism, but also generalized life experience (or some part of it) accumulated by parents (as well as their ancestors) and specially encoded in chromosome configurations. In other words, not only the size of the nose, eyes, weight, height, other features of the physiological constitution that are most characteristic of both parents and their closest relatives, but also the type of character, inclinations, habits, skills, abilities, and the whole wide range of mental and psycho-emotional experiences , which took place not only in the lives of parents, but also of other blood representatives of both clans, is basic information for each born person, initially connecting him with certain, most probable development scenarios.

Inherited genetic programs do not always manifest themselves immediately after we are born. Sometimes specific patterns remain hidden until something happens in our lives that triggers them. The likelihood that we will develop a disease may be present in our genes all the time. However, the disease remains harmless to us until some specific event or emotion awakens an ancient memory, and with it a gene, causing the disease to come out of the shadows. Like many functions of our physical body, these processes occur in a manner completely invisible to us.

But with all this, there is another side to this coin. Any type of heredity is just a physiologically and psychomentally expressed cliché of increased creative activity of stable psychomental manifestations characteristic of the parents at the time of the conception of a child and similarly adopted by them from their own ancestors. And like any form-cliché, synthesized on the basis of a stable interaction of specific information and the mental realizations subjectively caused by it, it is subject to the influence of influences similar to it in vibrations, but more powerful and stable in its intensity.

This means that by strengthening the influence on the configuration of one’s own self-awareness with radically new quality sfuurmm-forms, consciously modernized in the right direction and carrying in their structure significantly more favorable (for a given development vector) energy information, with a sufficiently high volitional effort, one can achieve such The result is that this hereditary trait in the genetic code will no longer be as dominant, and therefore it will either be expressed to a much lesser extent, or will be suppressed by stronger forms and not expressed at all.

Depending on the direction in which we make choices, in addition to those that are transmitted by parents and therefore become characteristic of descendants, hidden or already clearly expressed genetic heredity will either decrease and smooth out, or manifest itself to an even greater extent, that is, through self-awareness in In the active form, the least qualitative, or selfish, of the sfuurmm forms will appear.

Experimental data on the importance of positive thinking in DNA management, as proof of the above, also indicate that genes determine us only in part, but otherwise a person is responsible for his own illnesses, inclinations and mental disturbances that occur in his self-awareness.

Here it is worth giving an example of the research of the American geneticist Bruce Lipton. Over the years, he specialized in the field of genetic engineering, successfully defended his doctoral dissertation, and became the author of a number of studies. All this time, Lipton, like many geneticists and biochemists, believed that a person is a kind of biorobot, whose life is subordinated to a program written in his genes.

The turning point in Dr. B. Lipton's views was the experiments he conducted in the late 1980s to study the behavior of the cell membrane. Until then, science believed that it was the genes located in the cell nucleus that determined what should be passed through this membrane and what should not. However, B. Lipton's experiments showed that the behavior of genes can be influenced by external influences on the cell and even lead to changes in their structure.

B. Lipton said: “It has long been known that two people can have the same genetic predisposition to cancer. But in one the disease manifested itself, and in the other it did not. Why? Yes, because they lived differently: one experienced stress more often than the other; they had different self-esteem and sense of self, different trains of thought. Today I can affirm that we are capable of controlling our biological nature; We can, with the help of thoughts, faith and aspirations, influence our genes, including processes occurring at the molecular level. In essence, I didn't come up with anything new. For centuries, doctors have known about the placebo effect - when a patient is offered a neutral substance, claiming that it is a medicine. As a result, the substance actually has a healing effect. But, strangely enough, there has still been no scientific explanation for this phenomenon.”

The placebo effect is the main evidence that we are able to control our body. As you know, the effect works if a person has a certain attitude, absolute confidence in something, and as a result he gets what he wants. We use this principle everywhere in everyday life. If we want to watch a certain TV channel, we switch the receiver to it. This channel, one way or another, is potentially always present in our room, and in order to switch to this frequency, desire and interest are necessary.

In the context of the use of conscious control impulses, the same process occurs. If you use your mind to tune into resonance with the desired wave, you can begin to receive information - the information that this wave carries. And the higher the frequency of the wave, the more harmonious the information received will be.

To summarize all of the above, we can briefly say that “people have power over the genome.” This statement makes a person free, but at the same time gives him new responsibility for his own destiny.

2.4. How can you most effectively influence a particular section of DNA?

According to Iissiidiology, the human genome code, for all its apparent inviolability and immutability, is not an absolutely fixed energy-informational indicator of our three-dimensional biological structure due to the fact that the DNA molecule is the most dynamic part of a biological organism, continuously emitting electromagnetic fields of different quality, intensity and quality the characteristics of which continuously change both under the influence of the environment and under the influence of internal psycho-bio-chemical processes.

By generating positive thoughts based on positive emotions, we command the release of “positive” chemicals. Accordingly, negative thoughts give a negative adjustment. And this fact has a tremendous impact on how our cells behave.

This is also evidenced by some research conducted by scientists in the field of genetics. Renowned American scientists, Dr. Glen Rein and Rollin McCraty, working in collaboration with the HeartMath Institute, have demonstrated that focused good feelings and thoughts change DNA patterns in solution and produce biological effects “inside and outside the human body.” In one experiment, subjects were able to make DNA molecules curl or unwind by expressing their intention. The twisting of the DNA helix is ​​associated with the restoration of the molecule, and unwinding precedes cell division. In another experiment, the subject was able to influence the state of DNA when the sample was located at a distance of about half a kilometer from him. As a result of such studies, scientists have suggested (although they have not yet proven this experimentally) that with the help of conscious intention, it is possible to influence processes at the cellular level and even change the structure of DNA - that is, our genetic code!

All our ideas, emanations (thoughts), psychonations (feelings), like the DNA molecule itself, have their own frequency of implementation and a highly specific configuration of the electromagnetic field they generate. Consequently, the dynamics of the creative activity of each of the functionally similar groups of genes is stimulated or, conversely, suppressed by the active manifestation in the structures of our self-consciousness of all kinds of thoughts, feelings and aspirations.

At every moment of our existence, depending on the degree of quality of the configuration, only certain sections of the DNA structure can be activated in the information space of our self-consciousness. As soon as the focal dynamics changes its frequency, other parts of the genes are immediately connected to the process, which is reflected in the quality of life’s creativity; accordingly, the sphere of application of interests immediately changes. Hence the conclusion that everything is interdependent, inseparable, which explains why the quality of processes occurring in one area immediately causes the same changes in everything.

By consciously and quite steadily changing the dynamics of gene activity in certain sections of DNA with our good thoughts, positive feelings and altruistic-intellectual aspirations, we automatically (through the occurrence of a certain resonant effect in space-time) focus (that is, qualitatively self-identify) only in those configurations , whose environment is structured by more favorable (harmonious) circumstances of existence. Any person, with the help of a powerful altruistic intention, spiritual aspiration and stable mental and sensory focusing in the highest quality states, can thoroughly transform and modify the entire qualitative direction of the creative activity of the genes of his DNA, namely: to beneficially influence the changes occurring in the structure of the genetic apparatus.

To achieve such a state, you need to become more perfect and humane. The essence of this state lies in highly developed intellect and altruism, which contribute to the emergence of a powerful desire to live for others, learning to focus only on choices consistent with this high goal. If any obstacles appear in the fulfillment of your plans, then it is important to always remember that they - consciously and subconsciously - were also once created not by someone else, but by you personally, and, therefore, do not represent obstacles on the way to the goal , but hidden possibilities that are simply not deciphered at the moment.

To minimize the number of adverse consequences of our choices, each of us has only one reliable way: try to motivationally invest in any decision as many signs of highly sensitive intelligence and highly intellectual altruism, which are in the inexhaustible implementation possibilities of many protoform directions that potentially structure our focal dynamics , are characteristic precisely of the human principle of existence, that is, they are the main guidelines for the most harmonious human path of development.

But here it is important to pay attention to the fact that at the levels of altruism and intellectualism, the influence of protoform diffusivity is also observed, which is expressed in the form of excessive activity of one of the two components. That is, we can begin to show altruism, but at the same time be completely incompetent at the level of intelligence, or we can be intellectual, but extremely selfish. Both the first and second options are indicators of a shift in the focal dynamics of a person’s self-awareness in some protoform direction. Consequently, it is the harmonious fusion of altruism and intelligence, which are defined in Iissiidiology as highly intellectual altruism and highly sensitive intelligence, that represent the basis of the lluuvvumic, that is, human path. And responsibility, mercy, sympathy, tolerance, honesty are harmonious components of these characteristics that we develop in the human direction of development.

As soon as such choices become a natural part of human consciousness, the form-creators of DNA will begin to steadily modulate only the dynamics of high-frequency radiation into the geometry of space, and the current conditions of existence will automatically (resonantly) change, which will contribute to a much greater extent to further development in the lluuvvumic (human) direction than everything that surrounds our biological bodies now. We will not become more cold-blooded, it’s just that the blood plasma will acquire a different composition, the structure of the cell will change, and the next pair of chromosomal strands will be steadily formed in the DNA structure, and the number of synthetic amino acids will also increase. As a result of these massive mutagenic processes, the nervous, autonomic, hematopoietic, genitourinary, digestive, endocrine and respiratory systems in our biological organisms will change significantly in the future. Over time, this will lead to the fact that the activity of the bulk of DNA will shift to a greater extent from the spectrum of coarse-wave - low- and mid-frequency - levels to photon types of energy-informational relationships, in which biochemical reactions will lose their now decisive role. ,

Improving the quality of psychomental processes will be accompanied by the rapid development of technology in various fields of science. For example, all those qualitative tendencies that you would like to strengthen or, conversely, weaken with the help of laser radiation precisely directed to specific areas of the brain, can be changed and steadily replaced with the expected ones. Approximately the same results can be achieved with the help of individual developments of special microscopic nanodevices (nanorobots), programmed for deep penetration into the chromosomal structure of each cell, either for its thorough targeted reconstruction or for easy correction. How will this be done? After introducing several nanorobots into the body, they first begin intensive self-duplication (due to the chemical elements present in the body), gradually - like viruses - filling the cells of all systems and organs, and then begin to carry out the reconstruction program embedded in them for the entire biological organism.

By conducting thorough experiments based on this knowledge, scientists will establish which sections of a person’s DNA correspond to certain types of creative activity of the form-creators of her self-consciousness, and will be able to use these features to carry out targeted genetic engineering. Scientists already know which section of DNA and which genes are responsible for what, and in the future it will be possible to regulate the work of almost all the necessary sections of genes - set a program to activate some and suppress others.

But at the same time, we must not forget that if the focal dynamics begin to steadily deepen into the implementation of some selfish tendencies, then there will be a reorientation to worlds where the abilities for targeted virtual modeling of one’s own form will consistently - as their quality deteriorates - decrease and, in the end, we can again find ourselves in those worlds where such technological and genetic capabilities for the constant transformation of the forms we focus and our other universal abilities are completely absent.

Life constantly - and in the coming years will become more and more demanding - will begin to set for each of us certain boundaries of the quality of current choices, which will determine the tendentiousness of the next stage of our life: either we withdraw ourselves more and more from this direction of development, continuing to continue to realize ourselves in low-quality life circumstances with extremely limited opportunities for high-frequency creative realizations, including the lack of the ability of our biological body to self-heal, or we become more and more altruistic and highly intelligent, gradually beginning to increasingly realize ourselves as a creatively active part of new favorable worlds with more harmonious relationships in the human community, including expanding not only our creative possibilities, but also the properties of the surrounding world, because the configurations of the forms we focus on are the configuration of the geometry of space-time (the reality surrounding us): what we ourselves are, so is the environment us World.,

3. Conclusion

This paper provides a review of scientific views that indicate that our genetic code is not static and can change under the influence of external factors and behavioral reactions. Based on an individual understanding of issiidiology, answers were given to the following questions: what is the structure of DNA? Can a person or any other form of existence influence the genetic information embedded in this structure, and how effectively can this be done? A comparative analysis of scientific data was also carried out regarding the ability of a person and any other form of self-awareness to influence genetic information.

The following conclusions can be drawn:

Heredity and external factors, as well as human psychomental activity, are inextricably linked, in their totality being the basis for the formation of new relationships at the genetic level, which contributes to the universalization of the DNA structure of humans and all living beings - this gives rise to new opportunities for development;

Genetic information, as a set of energy-informational relationships, includes not only human, but also other experiences transmitted to us through identical genes that structure the organisms of animals, plants, minerals, and so on, obtained in different conditions of existence; Before we begin to develop in the human direction, we are forced by our focal dynamics to go through many protoform realizations; this is the essence of evolutionary development;

The diffusivity and photonic nature of DNA make it possible to continuously reproject all the experience gained between all existing forms, as well as interact with the DNA of all other forms of self-consciousness, which is the reason for the formation of additional experience, which, intuitively perceived, becomes a hint in solving certain problems;

The genetic program passed on by inheritance does not always manifest itself immediately after birth, it all depends on the quality of the choices made;

One of the effective ways to influence DNA is for a person to develop such characteristics as highly sensitive intelligence and highly intelligent altruism; but here it is also important to remember that due to the diffusivity of all forms of self-consciousness, a predominance of the activity of one of these qualities, characteristic of one of the protoform directions, can occur;

Thus, a variant of the development of any individual trait, both biological and psychological, unique in each specific case, can be the result of both a unique genetic constitution (genotype) and a unique life experience.

In any case, the quality of psychomental states and the individual characteristics of people’s biological organisms, through certain choices, are constantly changing, becoming either rougher and more painful, which is an indicator of the deepening of self-awareness into protoform realizations, or more perfect, universal, that is, humane. We ourselves are what we imagine ourselves to be. Both the world and people are also exactly the way we imagine them, how we treat them, what we think about them, this is the kind of relationship we build with them.

While working on this essay, I became convinced that we are quite capable of rewriting the stories imprinted in our genes, and thereby changing our destiny in the direction in which we want to see ourselves. I also came to the conclusion that new information about the structure and methods of influencing DNA, presented in issiidiology, will greatly help scientists in further work on the description (annotation) of the genome. And this is the identification of all genes (sequencing), establishing their functions, characterizing conditions, finding the causes of disease-causing mutations and other future research in the field of genetics that will lead to new revolutionary discoveries.

Articles on similar topics:

Footnotes:

Focal Dynamics is the main mechanism for the manifestation of any of the Form-structures of Space-Time (the so-called “geometry of space”); inertial formation (dynamics) in the information space of self-awareness of SFUURMM-Forms (ideas) about oneself and about the surrounding reality. Everything that we subjectively imagine as “worlds” and “realities” is an intermediate product of our own mental and psycho-creativity, adapted to the characteristic features of the perception system of our Self-Consciousness.

Http://www.bankreferatov.ru/referats/759B24F05C6A5D38C32570150078349B/%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%84%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%821.doc.html&Key=765987

5. Youth can be passed on from one DNA to others. http://www.spiritualschool.ru/?p=6108

6. Surkov O.V. Psychologist. The influence of stress at the gene level. http://www.b17.ru/article/3382/

7. S.A. Borinskaya, N.K. Yankovsky. Man and his genes. http://www.bibliotekar.ru/llDNK2.htm

8. The power of thought can change the genetic code of an organism. http://paranormal-news.ru/news/sila_mysli_sposobna_izmenjat_geneticheskij_kod_organizma/2014-06-11-9193

9. What key opens DNA? http://newspark.net.ua/texnologii/kakim-klyuchom-otkryvaetsya-dnk/

10. O.V. Oris, “Iissiidiology. Immortality is available to everyone,” 15th volume, publishing house: OJSC Tatmedia, PIK Idel-Press, Kazan, 2012 http://ayfaar.org/iissiidiology/books/item/427-tom-15

11. O.V. Oris, “Iissiidiology. Fundamentals”, 3rd volume, publishing house: OJSC “Tatmedia” “PIK “Idel-Press”, Kazan, 2014 http://ayfaar.org/iissiidiology/books/item/457-tom-3

12. DNA is influenced by consciousness. http://heart4life.com.ua/psikhologiya/dnk_poddaetsja_vlijaniju_soznanija

13. O.V. Oris, “Iissiidiology. Immortality is available to everyone,” 13th volume, publishing house: OJSC Tatmedia, PIK Idel-Press, Kazan, 2011 http://ayfaar.org/iissiidiology/books/item/417-tom-13

14. O.V. Oris, “Iissiidiology. Immortality is available to everyone,” 14th volume, publishing house: OJSC Tatmedia, PIK Idel-Press, Kazan, 2011 http://ayfaar.org/iissiidiology/books/item/418-tom-

O.V. Oris, “Iissiidiology. Fundamentals”, 3rd volume, publishing house: OJSC “Tatmedia” “PIK “Idel-Press”, Kazan, 2014 http://ayfaar.org/iissiidiology/books/item/457-tom-3

Bruce Lipton "The Biology of Belief"

American geneticist Bruce Lipton claims that with the help of true faith, solely by the power of thought, a person is indeed able to get rid of any disease. And there is no mysticism in this: Lipton’s research has shown that directed mental influence can change... the genetic code of the body.

Over the years, Bruce Lipton specialized in the field of genetic engineering, successfully defended his doctoral dissertation, and became the author of a number of studies that brought him fame in academic circles. In his own words, all this time Lipton, like many geneticists and biochemists, believed that a person is a kind of biorobot, whose life is subject to a program written in his genes. From this point of view, genes determine almost everything: features of appearance, abilities and temperament, predisposition to certain diseases and, ultimately, life expectancy. No one can change their personal genetic code, which means that, by and large, we can only come to terms with what is predetermined by nature.

The turning point in Dr. Lipton's life and views was his experiments in the late 1980s to study the behavior of the cell membrane. Until then, science believed that it was the genes located in the cell nucleus that determined what should be passed through this membrane and what should not. However, Lipton's experiments clearly showed that various external influences on a cell can affect the behavior of genes and even lead to changes in their structure.

All that remained was to understand whether such changes could be made with the help of mental processes, or, more simply, with the power of thought.

“In essence, I didn’t come up with anything new,” says Dr. Lipton. – For centuries, doctors have been well aware of the placebo effect – when a patient is offered a neutral substance, claiming that it is a miracle cure. As a result, the substance actually has a healing effect. But, oddly enough, there has still been no truly scientific explanation for this phenomenon. My discovery allowed me to give the following explanation: with the help of faith in the healing power of the medicine, a person changes the processes taking place in his body, including at the molecular level. He can “turn off” some genes, force others to “turn on” and even change his genetic code. Following this, I thought about various cases of miraculous healing. Doctors always dismissed them. But in fact, even if we had only one such case, it should have forced doctors to think about its nature. And to suggest that if one person succeeded, then perhaps others will do the same.

Of course, academic science did not accept these views of Bruce Lipton with hostility. However, he continued his research, during which he consistently proved that without any drugs it is quite possible to influence the genetic system of the body.

Including, by the way, with the help of a specially selected diet. So, for one of his experiments, Lipton bred a breed of yellow mice with congenital genetic defects, dooming their offspring to excess weight and short life. Then, with the help of a special diet, he ensured that these mice began to produce offspring completely different from their parents - normal color, thin and living as long as the rest of their relatives.

All this, you see, smacks of Lysenkoism, and therefore the negative attitude of academic scientists towards Lipton’s ideas was not difficult to predict. Nevertheless, he continued his experiments and proved that a similar effect on genes can be achieved with the help of, say, the influence of a strong psychic or through certain physical exercises. A new scientific direction that studies the influence of external influences on the genetic code is called “epigenetics.”

And yet, Lipton considers the main influence that can change the state of our health to be the power of thought, what happens not around us, but inside us.

“This is also nothing new,” says Lipton. – It has long been known that two people can have the same genetic predisposition to cancer, but one develops the disease and the other does not. Why? Yes, because they lived differently: one experienced stress more often than the other; they had different self-esteem and sense of self, which gave rise, accordingly, to different trains of thought. Today I can affirm that we are capable of controlling our biological nature; we can influence our genes with the help of thoughts, beliefs and aspirations. The great difference between man and other creatures on Earth lies precisely in the fact that he can change his body, heal himself from fatal diseases, and even get rid of hereditary diseases, giving mental instructions to the body for this. We do not have to be victims of our genetic code and life circumstances. Believe that you can be healed, and you will be cured of any disease. Believe that you can lose 50 kilograms - and you will lose weight!

At first glance, everything is extremely simple. But only at first glance…

If everything were so simple, then most people would easily solve any health problems by reciting simple mantras like “I can heal from this illness”, “I believe that my body is able to heal itself”...

But none of this happens, and, as Lipton explains, it cannot happen if mental attitudes penetrate only into the area of ​​consciousness, which determines only 5% of our mental activity, without affecting the remaining 95% - the subconscious. Simply put, only a few of those who believe in the possibility of self-healing with the power of their brain actually really believe in it - and therefore achieve success. Most people at the subconscious level deny this possibility. Even more precisely: their very subconscious, which, strictly speaking, controls all processes in our body on an automatic level, rejects this possibility. At the same time, it (again at the level of automatism) is usually guided by the principle that the likelihood that something positive will happen to us is much less than the further course of events in the worst case scenario.

According to Lipton, it is in this way that our subconscious begins to tune in during early childhood, from birth to six years, when the most insignificant events, words intentionally or accidentally spoken by adults, punishments, traumas form the “experience of the subconscious” and, ultimately, a person’s personality. Moreover, the very nature of our psyche is designed in such a way that everything bad that happens to us is deposited in the subconscious much more easily than the memory of pleasant and joyful events. As a result, the “subconscious experience” of the vast majority of people consists of 70% “negative” and only 30% of “positive”. Thus, to truly achieve self-healing, it is necessary to at least reverse this ratio. Only in this way can we break the barrier set by the subconscious mind against the intrusion of the power of our thoughts into cellular processes and the genetic code.

According to Lipton, the work of many psychics is precisely to break this barrier. But he suggests that a similar effect can be achieved through hypnosis and other methods. However, most of these methods are still waiting to be discovered. Or just widespread recognition.

After Lipton’s ideological revolution about a quarter of a century ago, the scientist continued his research in the field of genetics, but at the same time became one of the active organizers of various international forums with the goal of building bridges between traditional and alternative medicine. At the congresses and seminars he organizes, famous psychologists, doctors, biophysicists and biochemists sit next to all sorts of folk healers, psychics and even those who call themselves magicians or sorcerers. At the same time, the latter usually demonstrate their capabilities to the audience, and scientists brainstorm to try to explain them scientifically. And at the same time, they are thinking through future experiments that would help identify and explain the mechanism of the hidden reserves of our body.

It is in this symbiosis of esotericism and modern methods of treatment with the main reliance on the capabilities of the psyche of the patient himself, or, if you like, magic and science, that Bruce Lipton sees as the main path for the further development of medicine. Whether he is right or wrong, time will tell.

I'm not against other people's beliefs - everyone has the right to believe what they want and not have to make excuses for it. My attitude towards other people's beliefs changes somewhat when this belief begins to be preached as truth - I begin to ask questions. And I really don’t like it when this faith is presented under the guise of science, and even on behalf of a doctor of sciences.

In one of the mailings dedicated to translations from foreign languages, a surprise awaited me and my wife - an interview with a doctor of philological sciences, professor, head. Department of modern Russian language and methods of teaching it at Leningrad State Pedagogical University (Lipetsk) G. Zvezdova. As I read, I fell into more and more bewilderment and amazement. Weak traces of scientific thinking are heavily diluted with the mythological view of the world and the human psyche, which is so popular at present. And all this is being spread under the guise of science... I won’t undertake to judge the philological side of the interview, but as soon as G. Zvezdova enters the field of psychology, it begins... In general, judge for yourself what begins. I will comment on some of the most “remarkable” revelations (hereinafter my text is italics).

... The word is inextricably linked with consciousness, with spirit. The destruction of the word leads to the destruction of consciousness, and this process is circular. It continues at ever deeper levels.

Comment: already in these first lines one can see the classic magical attitude towards the word as an independent entity capable of destroying consciousness. True, simple questions immediately arise: what is the “destruction of the word” (I can’t imagine it well) and what is the “destruction of consciousness” in the mind of a doctor of philological sciences? Perhaps the “destruction of a word” means a change in its meaning? So this is a normal process of language development in this case. Don't like the new meaning of the word? Well, these are personal problems of the one who doesn’t like it.

- Could you give me an example?

Please. Aren’t the emerging expressions “making love”, “having sex” associated with sharp breaks in consciousness, in spirit, in the idea of ​​morality? Can you imagine that during the Great Patriotic War, a soldier wrote to his wife or fiancee in a letter from the front: “I dream of making love to you”? This is unimaginable, because then there was LOVE, and not the pursuit of it. But it didn’t stop there, the destruction went further when the words, God forgive me, “fuck”, “get laid” appeared. This is simply reducing human relations to the level of animals. This is a disregard for the great sacrament of love, both for oneself and for another person. Doesn't this represent a huge shift in the consciousness of young people? After all, love includes friendship, compassion, pity, and responsibility. All that was left from all this was the “basic instinct”... And when the word “philistinism” was replaced by the word “consumption”, spirituality began to disappear, because it was no longer ashamed to live only materially.

Comment: the usual story about how the world was better in the “old times.” The myth of the Golden Age is one of the most enduring among humanity. This “golden era” was best called by the Australian Aborigines: “the time of dreams.” As soon as these dreams begin, we can immediately conclude: we have entered the shaky ground of legends and myths, the main thing in which is emotional involvement, and not agreement with existing factology.

I agree that the words reflect changes in public consciousness. However, I am very surprised by the fact that the doctor of philological sciences did not think about the fact that the appearance of such a phrase as “make love” (calques from English), as well as the use of words like “fuck”, is due to the extreme poverty of the Russian language in the field of CENSORSHIP expression of sexuality , which was under a total (formal) ban. It was this disembodied, anti-sexual “morality” that led to the situation where “there is an ass, but there is no word.” And when she appeared, there were no words. And cause and effect are also replaced, in full agreement with the magical view of the world: it is words that change consciousness and society, and not changes in society and social psychology that lead to a change in the meaning that is put into words.

And I can easily imagine a soldier who, writing the word “love” in a letter, was thinking about sex. The current time is simply more frank in terms of expressing attitudes towards sex. Not so hypocritical.

- Can a word really play such a huge role in our lives?

But what about it? The word can both save and kill. It has enormous power and energy. It’s funny to even argue here; this has long been proven by biologists, physiologists, and representatives of the exact sciences. After all, everyone remembers the experience with plants, when they “scolded” one, and “praised” the other and said how much they loved it. The first one withered away, and the second one grew quickly. Everyone already knows how the structure of water changes depending on what words are spoken over it. So how can one assume that a person is not subject to such influence? And how can one be so irresponsible towards our native language, towards the words that we pronounce? Terrible changes are taking place not only in consciousness, but also in the genetic code.

Comment: It is simply impossible to comment on this anymore. A word is sounds that spread in space with a certain frequency. That's all his physical characteristics. A word influences a person and his consciousness through the meaning it carries, and not through “energy”. Moreover, this meaning can also change several times: the one who pronounces it puts one meaning, the one who accepts it can decipher it completely differently. It cannot destroy anything. Yell at the tree as much as you like - it will not crack, its genetic code will not change. Although... It depends how loudly you shout...

It’s not funny to argue, because the “special power of words” has not been proven by either biologists or physiologists, and a doctor of sciences retells legends and myths of pseudoscience about the magical power of words. A shaman will easily believe this, but a scientist?... There were no correct scientific studies with plants and water, but why does a doctor of science need critical thinking? Mythological consciousness is much better, because it works on the principle “I like it, so that’s how it is.” I propose a simple scientific experiment. Pour water into a glass, swear at it for an hour and say all sorts of “unkind words” such as “Hitler”, “evil”, “Satan”. Give a drink to the ill-wisher and... wait until he starts to be distorted and he mutates into a green man.

I would love to use powerful words that change the genetic code, but for some reason I’m having no luck. I probably don't know the right words. I also have a couple of enemies, in whose minds I would make terrible changes, but again, something doesn’t work out... And President Putin has probably been a mutant for a long time. Together with the opposition.

There are no analogues to this word (Universe) in any language. All other languages ​​have “cosmos,” that is, world order. And “universe” comes from the word “to inhabit.” It is not enough for our man to know how everything works; it is important for him to determine his place in this world, to understand why he came into it, that is, to “inhabit” it

My comment: UNIVERSE. Borrowing from Art.-Sl. language Derivative tracing paper of Greek. oikoumenē, suffer. prib. from oikeō "I dwell, I inhabit, I live." Universe literally - “inhabited” (earth). (School etymological dictionary). What is there about the uniqueness of the word “Universe”? And then there’s “universum” creeps up gloomily, looking unkindly at the doctor of sciences.

*********************

I'm very worried about what's happening. Reading this stream of consciousness, mixed with the worst examples of nationalism, from a DOCTOR OF SCIENCE... Hmm... If the above revelations had been spoken by a person who had nothing to do with science or education, then I would not have paid attention to him, you never know who has what legends and myths... It's a shame for the learned philological community, which is discredited by such interviews (especially since I know excellent philologists). The rollback of society to pure, uncomplicated mythology is the path to the darkest depths of the human unconscious. The sleep of reason gives birth to monsters, and it is very sad to be present at the birth of these monsters... Let's do better than the wonderful philologist Kronhaus

Changing human DNA that is passed on to future generations has long been considered ethically closed and prohibited in many countries. Scientists report they are using new tools to repair disease-causing genes in human embryos. Although the researchers are using defective embryos and do not intend to implant them into a woman's uterus, the work raises concerns.

Changing the DNA of human eggs, sperm or embryos is known as germinal alteration. Many scientists are calling for a moratorium on the review of clinical embryos, human germline editing, and many believe that this type of scientific activity should be prohibited.

However, editing the DNA of a human embryo may be ethically acceptable to prevent disease in the child, but only in rare cases and with guarantees. These situations may be a limited option for couples where they both have serious genetic conditions and for whom embryo editing is truly the last reasonable option if they want to have a healthy child.

The dangers of deliberately altering genes

Scientists believe that editing a human embryo may be acceptable to prevent a child from inheriting serious genetic diseases, but only if certain safety precautions and ethical criteria are met. For example, a couple may not have “reasonable alternatives,” such as choosing healthy embryos for in vitro fertilization (IVF) or through prenatal testing and aborting a fetus with a disease. Another situation that may qualify is if both parents have the same medical conditions, such as cystic fibrosis.

Scientists warn of the need for strict government oversight to prevent germline editing from being used for other purposes, such as giving a child desirable, distinctive features.

By editing genes in patients' cells that are not inherited, clinical trials are already underway to combat HIV, hemophilia and leukemia. It is believed that existing regulatory systems for gene therapy are sufficient to carry out such work.

Genome editing should not be used to increase potency, increase muscle strength in a healthy person, or lower cholesterol levels.

Human germline gene editing, or human germline modification, refers to the deliberate modification of genes that is passed on to children and future generations.

In other words, creation of genetically modified people. Human germline modification has been considered a taboo topic for many years due to safety and social reasons. It is formally banned in more than 40 countries.

Experiments on creating genetically modified people and the science of eugenics

However, in recent years, experiments have been carried out with human embryos using new methods of genetic engineering. Genes and human embryos associated with beta blood disease - thalassemia - were used for research. The experiments were largely unsuccessful. But gene editing tools are being refined in laboratories around the world and are expected to make it easier, cheaper and more precise to edit or delete genes than ever before. Modern, yet theoretical methods of genome editing will allow scientists to insert, delete and correct DNA with positive results. This opens up the prospect of treating certain diseases, such as sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and certain types of cancer.

Selection applied to humans – eugenics

Gene editing of human embryos or the direction of eugenics leads to the creation of genetically modified very different people. This raises serious safety concerns due to social and ethical issues. These range from the prospect of irreversible harm to the health of future children and generations to the opening of the door to new forms of social inequality, discrimination and conflict and a new era of eugenics.

The science of eugenics in human selection came into being in the middle of the last century as a Nazi science.

Scientists are not allowed to make changes to human DNA that is passed on to subsequent generations. Such an innovative move by the science of eugenics should only be considered after further research, after which changes can be carried out under strict restrictions. Such work should be prohibited to prevent serious illness and disability.

Variation caused by changes in genes is also called mutations.

It is a long-standing taboo to make changes to the genes of human sperm, eggs or embryos because such changes will be inherited by future generations. This is taboo in part because of fears that mistakes could inadvertently create new man-made diseases that could then become a permanent part of the human gene pool.

Another concern is that this species could be used for genetic modification for non-medical reasons. For example, scientists could theoretically try to create designer babies in which parents try to select their children's personality traits to make them smarter, taller, better athletes, or other supposedly necessary attributes.

Nothing like this is currently possible. But even the prospect raises the fear of scientists to significantly change the course of evolution and the creation of people who are considered genetically improved, to come up with dystopias of the future described in films and books.

Any attempt to create babies from sperm, eggs or embryos that have their own DNA and attempt to edit can only be done under very carefully controlled conditions and only to prevent a devastating disease.

It may be difficult to further draw the line between using gene editing to prevent or treat disease and using it to enhance a person's capabilities.

For example, if scientists can find that gene changes improve thinking abilities to fight off Alzheimer's dementia, then this could be considered preventive medicine. If you simply radically improve the memory of a healthy person, then this is no longer a medical direction.

When is it legal to change DNA?

The ability to edit genes could be used to treat many diseases and perhaps even prevent many devastating disorders from occurring in the first place by editing out genetic mutations in sperm, eggs and embryos. Some potential changes could prevent a wide range of diseases, including breast cancer, Tay-Sachs disease, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and Huntington's disease.

Gene editing clinical trials should be permitted if:

• there is no “reasonable alternative” to prevent “serious illness”
• it has been convincingly proven that genes, when edited, eliminate the cause of the disease
• changes are aimed only at transforming genes that are associated with normal health conditions
• sufficient preliminary research has been conducted on the risks and potential health benefits
• ongoing, rigorous oversight to examine the impact of the procedure on the health and safety of participants, as well as long-term comprehensive plans
• There is maximum transparency in accordance with patient confidentiality and reassessment of health, social benefits and risks
• There are strong surveillance mechanisms in place to prevent the spread of a serious disease or condition.

Proponents of human germline editing argue that it could potentially reduce, or even eliminate, the occurrence of many serious genetic diseases and reduce human suffering around the world. Opponents say altering human embryos is dangerous and unnatural, and does not take into account the consent of future generations.

Discussion on modification of the human embryo

Let's start with the objection that changing the embryo is unnatural or playing against God.

This argument is based on the premise that what is natural is inherently good.

But diseases are natural and millions of people get sick and die prematurely - everything is completely natural. If we only protected natural beings and natural phenomena, we would not be able to use antibiotics to kill bacteria or otherwise practice medicine or fight drought, famine, pestilence. The healthcare system is being run in every developed country and can rightly be described as part of a comprehensive attempt to thwart the course of nature. Which is naturally neither good nor bad. Natural substances or natural treatments are better, if they are possible, of course.

Leads to an important moment in the history of medicine and genome editing and represents promising scientific endeavors for the benefit of all humanity.

Intervention in the human genome is allowed only for preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic purposes and without modifications for descendants.

Rapid advances in the field of so-called “designer babies” genetics increase the need for bioethics to engage in broader public debate and debate about the power of science. Science is able to genetically modify human embryos in the laboratory to control inherited traits such as appearance and intelligence.

As of now, many countries have signed an international convention prohibiting this type of gene editing and DNA modification.

American geneticist Bruce Lipton claims that with the help of true faith, solely by the power of thought, a person is indeed able to get rid of any disease. And there is no mysticism in this: Lipton’s research has shown that directed mental influence can change... the genetic code of the body.

Over the years, Bruce Lipton specialized in the field of genetic engineering, successfully defended his doctoral dissertation, and became the author of a number of studies that brought him fame in academic circles. In his own words, all this time Lipton, like many geneticists and biochemists, believed that a person is a kind of biorobot, whose life is subject to a program written in his genes. From this point of view, genes determine almost everything: features of appearance, abilities and temperament, predisposition to certain diseases and, ultimately, life expectancy. No one can change their personal genetic code, which means that, by and large, we can only come to terms with what is predetermined by nature.

The turning point in Dr. Lipton's life and views was his experiments in the late 1980s to study the behavior of the cell membrane. Until then, science believed that it was the genes located in the cell nucleus that determined what should be passed through this membrane and what should not. However, Lipton's experiments clearly showed that various external influences on a cell can affect the behavior of genes and even lead to changes in their structure.

Yan Smelyansky